[mpich2-dev] ADIO layering
Rob Ross
rross at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Dec 2 11:25:51 CST 2009
Hi John,
You're right that it would be useful to have a "stacking" concept in
ROMIO. There is no such thing though, unfortunately.
You might find this paper helpful as a guide for this kind of work; it
discusses some of the issues:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kimpe_logfs.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 129524 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich2-dev/attachments/20091202/e0711762/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
I've CC'd Dries, who did that work. He is the right person to answer
these questions.
Regards,
Rob
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:58 AM, John Bent wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm coding up a PLFS ADIO layer and I'm realizing that one drawback is
> that codes can't leverage multiple ADIO layers. Is this a concern? I
> guess no-one needs PVFS/PLFS since PVFS doesn't suffer from an N-1
> problem. And no-one needs PLFS/Lustre or PLFS/PanFS since both PanFS
> and Lustre have POSIX mount points. I just thought about this and was
> wondering if there are other concerns that I haven't thought of.
>
> Also, which is probably the best skeletal ADIO layer to use as a
> template?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
More information about the mpich2-dev
mailing list