[Swift-devel] A suggested web content strategy for Swift
Michael Wilde
wilde at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Mar 1 18:00:55 CST 2011
Yeah, that looks tedious. But there is also this form which works for most layouts:
Simple table:
===== ===== ======
Inputs Output
------------ ------
A B A or B
===== ===== ======
False False False
True False True
False True True
True True True
===== ===== ======
I dont think tables will make or break it for us.
I like the simple style of most of the other text constructs.
- Mike
----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 11:54 -0600, Michael Wilde wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > For what it's worth, I think that if folks don't want docbook
> > > (which
> > > I'd
> > > more inclined to drop if there was any other reasonable equivalent
> > > system that produces good html output),
> >
> > Did you look at the reStructured text and Sphinx alternative I
> > described, which is used by Python and many other projects?
>
> I believe that expressing tables like this:
> +--------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
> | row 1, col 1 | column 2 | column 3 | column 4 |
> +--------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
> | row 2 | Use the command ``ls | more``. |
> +--------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
> | row 3 | | | |
> +--------------+----------+-----------+-----------+
>
> ... is silly. You are drawing tables in text. Imagine the amount of
> work
> required to add or remove a column.
>
> The reason one would use this is if it would be desirable for the
> documentation to look presentable in a plain text source file.
--
Michael Wilde
Computation Institute, University of Chicago
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list