[Swift-devel] block allocation

[Zhao Zhang]

Sorry, Mihael, I didn't get your last question.

zhao

Mihael Hategan wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:33 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
>   
>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:49 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:31 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi, Mihael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did a clean run of 100 scip jobs on ranger. (scip is a new application 
>>>>>> from MCS).
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> And?
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> I need your help to make sure coaster is working as expected.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Did the workflow finish successfully? I'll assume "yes", since you
>>> didn't mention any errors, but it would be useful to state such things
>>> from the start.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes, it was successful.
>>     
>
> That's not a bad sign.
>
>   
>>> As far as it working as expected, I have more confidence in the workings
>>> of the algorithm itself than in the ancillary stuff. In other words, if
>>> you don't see errors/restarted jobs or stack traces in the logs, it's
>>> likely that things are fine.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> The log is at /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ less /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
>>>>> /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log: Permission denied
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> try now.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ date
>>> Wed May 27 17:26:51 CDT 2009
>>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ less /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
>>> /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log: Permission denied
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> sorry, try again.
>>     
>
> Looks ok. There are some things that should probably be adjusted there,
> but it looks reasonable. Where the queued/running jobs removed from the
> queue when the workflow finished?
>
>
>