[Swift-devel] block allocation
Mihael Hategan
hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Thu May 28 02:21:42 CDT 2009
You should check whether blocks are properly de-allocated when all the
work is done.
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 18:10 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
> Sorry, Mihael, I didn't get your last question.
>
> zhao
>
> Mihael Hategan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 17:33 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> Mihael Hategan wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:49 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:31 -0500, Zhao Zhang wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi, Mihael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I did a clean run of 100 scip jobs on ranger. (scip is a new application
> >>>>>> from MCS).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> And?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I need your help to make sure coaster is working as expected.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Did the workflow finish successfully? I'll assume "yes", since you
> >>> didn't mention any errors, but it would be useful to state such things
> >>> from the start.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes, it was successful.
> >>
> >
> > That's not a bad sign.
> >
> >
> >>> As far as it working as expected, I have more confidence in the workings
> >>> of the algorithm itself than in the ancillary stuff. In other words, if
> >>> you don't see errors/restarted jobs or stack traces in the logs, it's
> >>> likely that things are fine.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The log is at /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ less /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
> >>>>> /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log: Permission denied
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> try now.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ date
> >>> Wed May 27 17:26:51 CDT 2009
> >>> [hategan at communicado ~]$ less /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log
> >>> /home/zzhang/scip/ranger-logs/coasters.log: Permission denied
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> sorry, try again.
> >>
> >
> > Looks ok. There are some things that should probably be adjusted there,
> > but it looks reasonable. Where the queued/running jobs removed from the
> > queue when the workflow finished?
> >
> >
> >
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list