[Swift-devel] CPU usage with provider-deef

Ioan Raicu iraicu at cs.uchicago.edu
Sat Jun 16 15:06:49 CDT 2007


Right, I know!  It sounds trivial :), but I just haven't had the time to 
think about it... 
I think the latest Falkon code is pretty solid, but I would like to get 
to the bottom of why Nika's MolDyn 100 molecule run isn't working...
Unless there is a pressing need to look at the very latest code, let's 
do this next week (hopefully after we have Nika's app running)! 

Ioan

Ben Clifford wrote:
> At some point you need to switch to developing in SVN so that others can 
> play along. Freezing your development, sending me a tarball, waiting for 
> me to import to SVN, and then unfreezing your development and continuing 
> from an SVN checkout is approximately the easiest I can make it for you.
>
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Ioan Raicu wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes, I know I need to clean up the code, and remove unused (dead) code.  Can
>> this wait for the next version I am working on, so I don't do this clean-up
>> twice?  The version that is out there in testing currently is v0.8.  My
>> development version is v0.9.  I have been distracted lately from finishing up
>> v0.9, but its not far from being complete.  Mihael, when do you get back in
>> town? 
>> If this is something more urgent, then perhaps I can get you a clean-up
>> version of v0.8 in the coming week.
>>
>> Ioan
>>
>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 12:03 -0500, Mike Wilde wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> This should be fun, and a nice break from the I2U2 work that you've been
>>>> immersed in, Mihael.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I've already looked at the Falkon code and it's... a lot of code that
>>> does stuff that I understand only in principle. What you want isn't
>>> easy, and I have my reservations towards the amount of fun it involves.
>>>
>>> That being said, Ioan, would it be possible to have a cleaned up version
>>> of the code where there are no duplicate classes? It's hard for me to
>>> figure what's relevant or not in that case. And perhaps dead
>>> code/comments removed?
>>>
>>> Mihael
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Want to do a read-through soon, and send out comments for discussion that
>>>> can turn into a list of code improvements to bugzilize?
>>>>
>>>> What I think is important about Falkon is that its working, its proving
>>>> out the value of the provisioned direct-scheduling approach with numbers,
>>>> and that its working for Ioan as a vehicle for his research.
>>>>
>>>> What we want to get from the effort is a) Ioan progresses towards his PhD;
>>>> b) the immediate needs of our app-users get met; and c) we learn whats
>>>> needed in architecture, protocol and algorithm for a successful long-term
>>>> approach to running swift programs efficiently.
>>>>
>>>> Point is that everyone is open to changes and towards an eventual
>>>> re-design and re-write. This, Mihael, would be where you can propose,
>>>> design and implement the ideas you've expressed about implementing
>>>> provisioned direct-scheduling using Karajan's remote execution mechanisms.
>>>>
>>>> - Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ian Foster wrote, On 6/16/2007 10:59 AM:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> It seems important that Ioan sit down with Mihael and work through the
>>>>> Falkon code to see where it can be simplified, improved, etc. I am sure
>>>>> that this will result in problems being identified and fixed that will
>>>>> otherwise cost us time later.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Yourkit (www.yourkit.com) has free licenses for open source projects
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> their profiler. Point them to a globus web page that has your name,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> they'll send you the license. Alternatively, there are other profilers
>>>>>> out there, and I strongly recommend using them on such issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mihael
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:00 -0500, Ioan Raicu wrote:
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Nope, I think this is a different problem, or at least a subset of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> problems we were having before.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since we fixed the CPU utilization, and we moved to a bigger box (4
>>>>>>> CPUs with 2GB of memory), everything is happening in a timely
>>>>>>> fashion
>>>>>>> (a few ms per notification delivery throughout the experiment).
>>>>>>> Plus,
>>>>>>> I believe the view is consistent (the same tasks look complete on
>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>> ends) between Falkon and Swift, but we are still checking on this as
>>>>>>> the run was made just last night for the 100 mol run.  We'll keep
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> posted with what we find.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ioan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ben Clifford wrote:               
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Ioan Raicu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> having problems with the 100 molecule run in MolDyn.  Its not
>>>>>>>>> clear where the
>>>>>>>>> problem is, on the surface Falkon looks fine... we are looking
>>>>>>>>> into where
>>>>>>>>> everything breaks to cause Swift to not continue with the
>>>>>>>>> workflow to
>>>>>>>>> completion!
>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> The same problem that you showed me the other day or different?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with 'the same problem' being that falkon thinks all the jobs are
>>>>>>>> done; but that falkon's measure response time for sending
>>>>>>>> completion notifications gets approximately linearly longer over
>>>>>>>> time and the swift JVM uses ~100% and doesn't inidicate job
>>>>>>>> completion at all after a certain period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> or different symptoms now?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> ============================================
>>>>>>> Ioan Raicu
>>>>>>> Ph.D. Student
>>>>>>> ============================================
>>>>>>> Distributed Systems Laboratory
>>>>>>> Computer Science Department
>>>>>>> University of Chicago
>>>>>>> 1100 E. 58th Street, Ryerson Hall
>>>>>>> Chicago, IL 60637
>>>>>>> ============================================
>>>>>>> Email: iraicu at cs.uchicago.edu
>>>>>>> Web:   http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/~iraicu
>>>>>>>        http://dsl.cs.uchicago.edu/
>>>>>>> ============================================
>>>>>>> ============================================
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>> -- 
>>>>>
>>>>>    Ian Foster, Director, Computation Institute
>>>>> Argonne National Laboratory & University of Chicago
>>>>> Argonne: MCS/221, 9700 S. Cass Ave, Argonne, IL 60439
>>>>> Chicago: Rm 405, 5640 S. Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637
>>>>> Tel: +1 630 252 4619.  Web: www.ci.uchicago.edu.
>>>>>       Globus Alliance: www.globus.org.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Swift-devel mailing list
>>>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
>>>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Swift-devel mailing list
>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>     
>
>   

-- 
============================================
Ioan Raicu
Ph.D. Student
============================================
Distributed Systems Laboratory
Computer Science Department
University of Chicago
1100 E. 58th Street, Ryerson Hall
Chicago, IL 60637
============================================
Email: iraicu at cs.uchicago.edu
Web:   http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/~iraicu
       http://dsl.cs.uchicago.edu/
============================================
============================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20070616/d2ad241c/attachment.html>


More information about the Swift-devel mailing list