[petsc-users] Problem with solving Poisson eqn for some cases
TAY wee-beng
zonexo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 04:19:34 CDT 2018
On 17/3/2018 1:15 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:54 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/3/2018 6:21 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:51 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
>> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm running a CFD code which solves the momentum and Poisson
>> eqns.
>>
>> Due to poor scaling with HYPRE at higher cpu no., I decided
>> to try using PETSc with boomeramg and gamg.
>>
>> I tested for some small cases and it work well. However, for
>> the large problem which has poor scaling, it gives an error
>> when I change my Poisson solver from pure HYPRE to PETSc with
>> boomeramg and gamg.
>>
>> The error is :
>>
>> Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation,
>> probably memory access out of range
>>
>> I tried using:
>>
>> -poisson_ksp_type richardson -poisson_pc_type hypre
>> -poisson_pc_type_hypre boomeramg
>>
>> -poisson_ksp_type gmres -poisson_pc_type hypre
>> -poisson_pc_type_hypre boomeramg
>>
>> -poisson_pc_type gamg -poisson_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1
>>
>> but they all gave similar error.
>>
>> So why is this so? How should I troubleshoot? I am now
>> running a debug ver of PETSc to check the error msg.
>>
>>
>> 1) For anything like this, we would like to see a stack trace
>> from the debugger or valgrind output.
>>
>> 2) We do have several Poisson examples. Does it fail for you on
>> those?
> Hi,
>
> Can you recommend me some suitable egs? Esp in Fortran?
>
>
> Here is 2D Poisson
>
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/src/4b6141395f14f0c7d1415a2ff0158eec75a27d63/src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex5f.F90?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
>
>>
>> 3) You can also try ML, which is the same type of MG as GAMG.
>> (--download-ml).
>>
I have recompiled PETSc with ML. Is there an example command line
options which I can use for ML?
Another question is generally speaking, is geometric multigrid (GMG)
faster than algebraic?
I tested on a small problem and the time taken varies from 1.15min
(HYPRE, geometric) to 3.25 (GAMG). BoomerAMG is 1.45min.
Besides HYPRE, is there any other GMG I can use?
>
> My cluster can't connect to the internet. Where can I 1st download it?
>
> Similarly, how can I find out the location of the ext software by
> myself?
>
>
> The locations are all in the configure Python modules:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/src/4b6141395f14f0c7d1415a2ff0158eec75a27d63/config/BuildSystem/config/packages/ml.py?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>>
>> ================================================
>> TAY Wee-Beng (Zheng Weiming) 郑伟明
>> Personal research webpage:
>> http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website
>> <http://tayweebeng.wixsite.com/website>
>> Youtube research showcase:
>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC72ZHtvQNMpNs2uRTSToiLA>
>> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/tay-weebeng>
>> ================================================
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>> which their experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <http://www.caam.rice.edu/%7Emk51/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/%7Emk51/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20180319/85db9ca5/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list