[petsc-users] incomplete cholesky with a drop tolerance
Umut Tabak
u.tabak at tudelft.nl
Sun Jul 22 13:26:17 CDT 2012
On 07/22/2012 08:22 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Umut Tabak <u.tabak at tudelft.nl
> <mailto:u.tabak at tudelft.nl>> wrote:
>
> I am not sure at the moment I should check it further but the mesh
> is fine enough that this should not be a problem in the frequency
> range of interest.
>
>
> If you are using the minimum to resolve the waves, then multigrid
> won't buy you much (unless you use very technical coarse spaces for
> which there is no particular software support). But if your waves are
> lower frequency (e.g. due to geometric/coefficient structure), there
> may be more benefit to using multigrid.
>
> Note that there is also a body of literature for solving Helmholtz
> using multigrid preconditioners for Krylov methods by introducing a
> complex shift.
I should check these, however the easiest(for the moment) using icc and
cg is buying important cost savings at the moment, %20 percent is not
that bad for a start even for that ill-conditioned system... I will try
to read a bit more on these, thx.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120722/23fa0cba/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list