[petsc-users] PETSc fortran type check

[Panruo Wu]

Thanks

Panruo

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Panruo Wu <pwu at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>
>> Mat,
>>
>> Could you give some details on how I can find all the unchecked(checked)
>> subroutines so that I can narrow down my search area when
>> segfaults occur?
>>
>
> The right way to narrow this down is to use -start_in_debugger since you
> will
> immediately get the stack trace showing the offending method.
>
>    Matt
>
>
>> Thanks
>> panruo
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Panruo Wu <pwu at mymail.mines.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello PETSC developers and users,
>>>>
>>>> I read on link
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Sys/UsingFortran.html
>>>>
>>>> that approach 2 & 3 have some type check functionalities.  My question
>>>> is which subroutines
>>>> are type checked and which are not.  For example I guess that
>>>> DMDACreate3d is checked
>>>> (I'm using approach 3).
>>>>
>>>
>>> The ones with interface declarations.
>>>
>>>    Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks and best wishes,
>>>> Panruo Wu
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>> experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120827/35724382/attachment.html>