[petsc-users] Symmetric matrix filling
Alexander Grayver
agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de
Wed Nov 30 10:08:39 CST 2011
On 30.11.2011 16:22, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Alexander Grayver
> <agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de <mailto:agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de>> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that MAT(S)BAIJ is what I need. My matrix symmetric,
> but not block.
> Well, I solve vector equations and there are 2-3 blocks (depending
> on the problem dimension), but this blocks normaly have size of >
> 10^5. So which block size should I specify to be efficient?
>
>
> Just use 1.
And for d_nz/o_nz also 1?
>
> Matt
>
> Regards,
> Alexander
>
> On 30.11.2011 14:27, Alexander Grayver wrote:
>> Thanks Matt!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alexander
>>
>> On 30.11.2011 14:16, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Alexander Grayver
>>> <agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de <mailto:agrayver at gfz-potsdam.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to use mumps through PETSc now with symmetric
>>> matrix and cholesky factorization.
>>> When I use it directly I fill up only upper part of the
>>> matrix and set mumid%SYM = 2. Is that possible to follow
>>> same way with petsc?
>>> Which options do I have to choose?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/Mat/MATSBAIJ.html
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alexander
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>>> which their experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111130/c1bd227e/attachment.htm>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list