[petsc-dev] gcc 10

[Barry Smith]

  The C++ complex thing and the gfortran thing are totally unrelated except they both come from Mark and involve the Gnu community.


> On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> 
> I don't know what failure you're referring to.  The C++ complex thing might have been a matter of the antique compiler.
> 
> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something with
>> did in it?
>> 
>>   Matt
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> You want this for PETSc or for external packages?  We add it for a bunch
>>> of external packages.  I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for
>>> months now.
>>> 
>>> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to
>>> enable
>>>> 
>>>>  -fallow-argument-mismatch
>>>> 
>>>> from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has
>>>> PetscObjectSetName() in it.
>>>> 
>>>>  Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>      Matt
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
>>> their
>>>> experiments lead.
>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>> 
>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
>>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>> 
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>