[petsc-dev] gcc 10

[Satish Balay]

Well starting a new e-mail thread for an old issue can cause these confusions. Its best to preserve e-mail threads.

Satish

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
>   The C++ complex thing and the gfortran thing are totally unrelated except they both come from Mark and involve the Gnu community.
> 
> 
> > On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:40 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know what failure you're referring to.  The C++ complex thing might have been a matter of the antique compiler.
> > 
> > Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> > 
> >> Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something with
> >> did in it?
> >> 
> >>   Matt
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> You want this for PETSc or for external packages?  We add it for a bunch
> >>> of external packages.  I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for
> >>> months now.
> >>> 
> >>> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
> >>> 
> >>>> Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to
> >>> enable
> >>>> 
> >>>>  -fallow-argument-mismatch
> >>>> 
> >>>> from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has
> >>>> PetscObjectSetName() in it.
> >>>> 
> >>>>  Thanks,
> >>>> 
> >>>>      Matt
> >>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> >>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> >>> their
> >>>> experiments lead.
> >>>> -- Norbert Wiener
> >>>> 
> >>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
> >>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> >> experiments lead.
> >> -- Norbert Wiener
> >> 
> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>