[petsc-dev] gcc 10

[Jed Brown]

I don't know what failure you're referring to.  The C++ complex thing might have been a matter of the antique compiler.

Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:

> Why did Mark have the gcc 10 failure on our example. Was it something with
> did in it?
>
>    Matt
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:43 PM Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>
>> You want this for PETSc or for external packages?  We add it for a bunch
>> of external packages.  I've been building PETSc with gcc/gfortran-10 for
>> months now.
>>
>> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Do we have gfortran from gcc 10 running anywhere? We need a check to
>> enable
>> >
>> >   -fallow-argument-mismatch
>> >
>> > from configure. Should be as simple as compiling Fortran which has
>> > PetscObjectSetName() in it.
>> >
>> >   Thanks,
>> >
>> >       Matt
>> >
>> > --
>> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
>> their
>> > experiments lead.
>> > -- Norbert Wiener
>> >
>> > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <
>> http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>