[petsc-dev] Discussion about time-dependent optimization moved from PR

[Matthew Knepley]

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I don't think the full space method is of questionable practically in the
> > time-independent case.
> > This is still important in this discussion because the way we talk about
> > the optimization problem,
> > and the specification of adjoint problems will inevitably be shared.
>
> Let's simplify a lot.  If you want to share the specification for
> sensitivities, propose for us a shared specification for just the
> forward problem that is amenable to Borzi-type smoothers.
>

Fair.

  Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20171015/d82f8a74/attachment.html>