[petsc-dev] nightlybuilds (next vs next-tmp)

[Smith, Barry F.]

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote:
> 
> >
> > Have we tried histogramming test times? It would be nice to know how much
> > cumulative
> > time it takes to run 37%, 67%, 95%, etc.
> 
> I'm not sure what 'histogramming test time' means.
> 
> The below looked like cumulative times over all tests. I want the time for each test, and then
> we bin them into say 10s wide bins and see which ones are taking the most time.

  WE FREAKING NEED TO CONVERT TO THE NEW TEST HARNESS TO DO THIS, then it is easy. 

  So everyone, please, instead of spending twenty minutes a day sending and reading email about testing spend 20 minutes a day converting examples from the old tests to the new harness!!!!!


> 
>    Matt
>  
> All logs record time. And Karl's script summarizes those times on the
> dashboard. For eg:
> 
> http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/11/11/maint.html
> 
> If you want to do some analysis on those times - you can grab the
> [historical] logs and run the required analysis.
> 
> Satish
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
> 
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/