[petsc-dev] nightlybuilds (next vs next-tmp)

[Matthew Knepley]

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Nov 2017, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
> >
> > Have we tried histogramming test times? It would be nice to know how much
> > cumulative
> > time it takes to run 37%, 67%, 95%, etc.
>
> I'm not sure what 'histogramming test time' means.
>

The below looked like cumulative times over all tests. I want the time for
each test, and then
we bin them into say 10s wide bins and see which ones are taking the most
time.

   Matt


> All logs record time. And Karl's script summarizes those times on the
> dashboard. For eg:
>
> http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2017/11/11/maint.html
>
> If you want to do some analysis on those times - you can grab the
> [historical] logs and run the required analysis.
>
> Satish
>



-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20171112/3b0c090e/attachment.html>