[petsc-dev] petsc rewind of next branch?
Matthew Knepley
knepley at gmail.com
Sun Jun 18 07:24:39 CDT 2017
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
> smithc11 <smithc11 at rpi.edu> writes:
>
> > I suppose this email should/could go to a petsc mailing list. If you
> > agree, please let me know which one and I'll gladly send it there.
>
> Cc'd petsc-next.
>
> > I was just reading through the petsc developer's guide
> > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/wiki/developer-instructions-git
> > and an older presentation of yours
> > https://jedbrown.org/files/20141113-Software.pdf
> > on git workflows involving a master, next, and topic branches.
> >
> > In petsc, is the next branch rewound (reset to point at the head of
> > master) periodically (i.e., after a release)?
>
> After a feature release.
>
> > If so, what git commands are used for the rewind? In the gitworkflows
> > docs: https://git-scm.com/docs/gitworkflows a 'reset --hard' is used
> > followed by an 'announcement'. I'm guessing the announcement tells
> > folks who cloned the repo that they should expect a history change in
> > next?
>
> Yup. Satish has been doing this lately, but I expect the procedure
> looks like
>
Satish, is this already scripted? If not, maybe we should work on that for
this
release. I don't know if anyone else could currently release, so we should
rachet
up the automation. I am fine starting it.
Matt
> git checkout master
> ... set release version strings
> git commit -am'PETSc 3.8 feature release'
> git tag -s
> git checkout maint
> git merge --ff-only master
> git checkout master
> ... set PETSC_VERSION_RELEASE=0 (a flag meaning that this version is not
> a release)
> git checkout next
> git reset --hard master
> git push origin maint master +next
>
> Then send an email announcing the release and that 'next' has been
> rewound. The easiest thing for users is to run
>
> git branch -D next
>
> in which case any subsequent
>
> git checkout next
>
> will create it anew.
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20170618/951ea397/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list