[petsc-dev] Open solaris 64bit printf bug?

[Satish Balay]

I couldn't get this build [with 64-bit-indices] compiled in debug
mode. The compiler just hangs with a couple of source files.

          CC arch-opensolaris-misc/obj/src/mat/impls/aij/seq/inode.o
          CC arch-opensolaris-misc/obj/src/dm/impls/da/fdda.o

I had to manaully compile these sources with '-O' - instead of '-g' to
get the build going :(

Satish


On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
>   And just to annoy me I cannot get -start_in_debugger to work on that machine. Valgrind has no complaints on a Mac with the examples.
> 
>   I've found some miss-use of PetscViewerASCIIPushSynchronized() and %d in parts of plex, I don't see how they could cause this problem but I am fixing them and will push that. Maybe we'll get lucky.
> 
>   Barry
> 
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Tobin Isaac <tisaac at ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Here's a partial diff from http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2015/09/03/examples_next_arch-opensolaris-misc_n-gage.log:
> > 
> >    232c232
> >    <   field 0 with 2 components
> >    ---
> >>  field 0 with 0 components
> >    234,242c234,242
> >    <   (   2) dim  2 offset   0 0.5 0
> >    <   (   3) dim  2 offset   2 1 0
> >    <   (   4) dim  2 offset   4 0 0.5
> >    <   (   5) dim  2 offset   6 0.5 0.5
> >    <   (   6) dim  2 offset   8 1 0.5
> >    <   (   7) dim  2 offset  10 0 1
> >    <   (   8) dim  2 offset  12 0.5 1
> >    <   (   9) dim  2 offset  14 0.5 0.25
> >    <   (  10) dim  2 offset  16 0.25 0.5
> >    ---
> >>  (   2) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0
> >>  (   3) dim  0 offset   2 1 0
> >>  (   4) dim  0 offset   2 0 0.5
> >>  (   5) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0.5
> >>  (   6) dim  0 offset   2 1 0.5
> >>  (   7) dim  0 offset   2 0 1
> >>  (   8) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 1
> >>  (   9) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0.25
> >>  (  10) dim  0 offset   2 0.25 0.5
> > 
> > The numbers that printf is making 0 (or 2) clearly aren't, because
> > they are used to iterate over a section and display its contents.  But
> > other PetscInt's are printed fine elsewhere.  Weird.
> > 
> >  Toby
> > 
> 
>