[petsc-dev] Open solaris 64bit printf bug?

Barry Smith bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Sep 3 22:56:54 CDT 2015


> On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:52 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> I couldn't get this build [with 64-bit-indices] compiled in debug
> mode. The compiler just hangs with a couple of source files.
> 
>          CC arch-opensolaris-misc/obj/src/mat/impls/aij/seq/inode.o
>          CC arch-opensolaris-misc/obj/src/dm/impls/da/fdda.o
> 
> I had to manaully compile these sources with '-O' - instead of '-g' to
> get the build going :(

  I noticed that same hang but wasn't bright enough to try removing the -g on them.

  We use to have trouble with compilers with optimization turned on, now we have trouble with optimization turned off!

  Barry

> 
> Satish
> 
> 
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Barry Smith wrote:
> 
>> 
>>  And just to annoy me I cannot get -start_in_debugger to work on that machine. Valgrind has no complaints on a Mac with the examples.
>> 
>>  I've found some miss-use of PetscViewerASCIIPushSynchronized() and %d in parts of plex, I don't see how they could cause this problem but I am fixing them and will push that. Maybe we'll get lucky.
>> 
>>  Barry
>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Tobin Isaac <tisaac at ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Here's a partial diff from http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/nightlylogs/archive/2015/09/03/examples_next_arch-opensolaris-misc_n-gage.log:
>>> 
>>>   232c232
>>>   <   field 0 with 2 components
>>>   ---
>>>> field 0 with 0 components
>>>   234,242c234,242
>>>   <   (   2) dim  2 offset   0 0.5 0
>>>   <   (   3) dim  2 offset   2 1 0
>>>   <   (   4) dim  2 offset   4 0 0.5
>>>   <   (   5) dim  2 offset   6 0.5 0.5
>>>   <   (   6) dim  2 offset   8 1 0.5
>>>   <   (   7) dim  2 offset  10 0 1
>>>   <   (   8) dim  2 offset  12 0.5 1
>>>   <   (   9) dim  2 offset  14 0.5 0.25
>>>   <   (  10) dim  2 offset  16 0.25 0.5
>>>   ---
>>>> (   2) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0
>>>> (   3) dim  0 offset   2 1 0
>>>> (   4) dim  0 offset   2 0 0.5
>>>> (   5) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0.5
>>>> (   6) dim  0 offset   2 1 0.5
>>>> (   7) dim  0 offset   2 0 1
>>>> (   8) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 1
>>>> (   9) dim  0 offset   2 0.5 0.25
>>>> (  10) dim  0 offset   2 0.25 0.5
>>> 
>>> The numbers that printf is making 0 (or 2) clearly aren't, because
>>> they are used to iterate over a section and display its contents.  But
>>> other PetscInt's are printed fine elsewhere.  Weird.
>>> 
>>> Toby
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list