[petsc-dev] PETSc blame digest (next) 2015-04-08

William Gropp wgropp at illinois.edu
Wed Apr 8 10:31:07 CDT 2015


Ah.  Well, my general sentiment remains.  Warnings should be an *aid*, not a *demand*.  If they’re too annoying, it isn’t hard to define rules to filter out most such warnings.

Bill

On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:

> William Gropp <wgropp at illinois.edu> writes:
>> The issue is whether you want to be a slave to some compilers buggy warning code.
> 
> Sure, but this is not a compiler bug.  The statement really is
> unreachable when PETSC_USE_ERRORCHECKING (default), but it can't be
> fixed without breaking a different configuration.  It could be fixed in
> this case with more macros, but the problem is more general and we
> probably need to turn off some warnings.




More information about the petsc-dev mailing list