[petsc-dev] sor smoothers
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Mon Sep 9 16:35:26 CDT 2013
On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> writes:
>> I don't care if PCMGSetResidual stays around for now but I do not
>> think we should "point to it" as a standard way for people to do
>> things; I think we should improve how the two slots are used with
>> PCMG, it really has never been thought about at all and whenever
>> possible I think using the two slots appropriately is better than
>> PCMGSetResidual and will solve most of the "use" cases.
>
> Fine, I was just not eager to _delete_ PCMGSetResidual until we had
> established a complete replacement, and even then, it might be enough to
> leave it as "advanced" and suggest the preferred alternative in the man
> page. It just doesn't seem expensive to support and I don't think it
> causes people to tangle themselves up in bad design.
It doesn't have its own object which is kind of limiting.
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list