The latest.
Rob Ross
rross at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jul 29 13:11:42 CDT 2003
I've tagged in for RobL for a bit, and BillG has taken another look at the
Fortran bindings. Using the parallel-netcdf list for your contact with
ANL is your best bet; that gets all of us and is captured for posterity
:).
We should have another release out tonight that deals with:
- some of the many warnings
- the install issue
- Tyce's fixes to the test
Plus whatever else we can get done today. I'm going to dust off my LLNL
account and see if I can log in still as well.
The last week or so has really helped us identify issues that need to be
addressed, and we're trying to knock these out ASAP. You're right that
everyone here has other things on their respective plates as well, but
this is a high priority for us, and I still think we'll have this worked
out very soon.
Regards,
Rob
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, John Tannahill wrote:
> The latest =>
>
> I moved from seaborg (NERSC) back to frost (LLNL/ASCI) and ran the two
> attached test codes, one in Fortran and one in C. I used the
> pnetcdf-0.8.5 installed by Tyce Mclarty. I ran both tests. They run
> to completion. The netCDF output for the C program appears to be correct;
> the output for the Fortran program does not. The outputs are below.
>
> I need to know how to address this problem in the most expeditious way
> possible? I know I have been flooding the airways with e-mail, but I
> am unsure of a better way? I am sure that you folks at ANL have other
> things on your plate, but my main focus here is to make use of a
> parallel netCDF capability in a Fortran code, although I am willing to
> help in any way I can with testing, debugging, etc. I need to make
> faster progress if at all possible. Is there one person that should be
> my primary point of contact at ANL? Tyce has been very helpful here at
> LLNL, as well as Rob Latham at ANL and Brad Gallagher at the University
> of Chicago, but I feel that things are getting bogged down and I need to
> see the light at the end of the tunnel.
>
> Fortran netCDF output from test case =>
>
> /g/g17/jrt/Pnf[69]: ncdump *.nc
> netcdf pnf_test {
> dimensions:
> level = 536874476 ;
> latitude = 536874480 ;
> }
>
>
> C netCDF output from test case =>
>
> /g/g17/jrt/Pnc[66]: ncdump *.nc
> netcdf pnc_test {
> dimensions:
> level = 10 ;
> latitude = 20 ;
> longitude = 30 ;
> variables:
> float tt(level, latitude, longitude) ;
> data:
>
> tt =
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> ...
>
>
> Regards,
> John
>
>
> --
> ============================
> John R. Tannahill
> Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab.
> P.O. Box 808, M/S L-103
> Livermore, CA 94551
> 925-423-3514
> Fax: 925-423-4908
> ============================
>
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list