NC_FILL (no plans to implement)
Russ Rew
russ at unidata.ucar.edu
Tue Jul 22 14:38:43 CDT 2003
Hi,
>From the announcement to netcdfgroup, the "features not yet
implemented" includes
- NC_FILL (no plan to implement)
Is this because preserving fill value semantics makes it harder to do
parallel I/O? HDF5 supports fill-values for parallel I/O using
MPI-IO, so I'm not sure why it's explicitly ruled out, or whether we
should consider cutting it from our proposed feature list for the
netCDF-4 on HDF5 project.
--Russ
_____________________________________________________________________
Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program
russ at unidata.ucar.edu http://my.unidata.ucar.edu
More information about the parallel-netcdf
mailing list