NC_FILL (no plans to implement)

Russ Rew russ at unidata.ucar.edu
Tue Jul 22 14:38:43 CDT 2003


Hi,

>From the announcement to netcdfgroup, the "features not yet
implemented" includes

 - NC_FILL (no plan to implement)

Is this because preserving fill value semantics makes it harder to do
parallel I/O?  HDF5 supports fill-values for parallel I/O using
MPI-IO, so I'm not sure why it's explicitly ruled out, or whether we
should consider cutting it from our proposed feature list for the
netCDF-4 on HDF5 project.

--Russ

_____________________________________________________________________

Russ Rew                                         UCAR Unidata Program
russ at unidata.ucar.edu                      http://my.unidata.ucar.edu



More information about the parallel-netcdf mailing list