0.8.9 on QSC (ASCi Q)

[JB Gallagher]

All,

Unfortunately this didn't seemed to fix things:

setenv FC "f77 -i8"
setenv F90 "f90 -i8"
setenv FFLAGS "-i8"

./configure --prefix=<dir> --with-mpi=<mpi?

Still produced the same configure error:

Checking whether size_t and int size match... no
configure: error: This is a critical error; please report this size mismatch
to the developers!

I'll keep tyring tommorow and let you know if I make any progress, does
anyone else have any other ideas?

thanks for your help and quick response.

--Brad

Jianwei Li wrote:

> Brad,
>
> I checked and found that Bill just said you can bypass the fortran
> interface since you don't need it.
>
> And here is the following answer from Tyce about how to bypass it:)
>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:35:10 -0700
> From: Tyce Mclarty <mclarty3 at llnl.gov>
> To: JB Gallagher <jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu>,
> jianwei at ece.northwestern.edu,
>      rross at mcs.anl.gov, parallel-netcdf at mcs.anl.gov,
>      jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu
> Subject: Re: Compiling parallel-netcdf 0.8.9 on QSC (ASCI Q)
>
> Can't you use the -i8 fortran flag to force 64 bit integers, so it will
> pass the configure test?
>
>  From f90 man page:
>
>    -i8         Makes default integer and logical variables 8-bytes long
> (same
>                as the -integer_size 64 option).  The default is
> -integer_size
>                32.
>
> Tyce
>
> Hope it will help you through.
>
> ---
>
> Jianwei
>
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, JB Gallagher wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I posted a question to the list a while ago about building the newest
> > parallel-netcdf on ASCI Q, I believe Bill Gropp got back to me on my
> > problem, but I can no longer find his reply. I'm running into a problem
> > with the configure:
> >
> > checking whether size_t and int size match... no
> > configure: error: This is a critical error; please report this size
> > mismatch to the developers!
> >
> > And I believe Bill said something to the effect that this was put in for
> > checks in building the fortran interface and implied that if I didn't
> > need the fortran interface (which I currently don't) I could bypass this
> > check. Can anyone help me with this?
> >
> > After getting some mpi issues out of the way, I am able to get a really
> > old version of parallel netcdf built on Q, but it doesn't work reliably
> > on greater than 8 processors.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --Brad
> >
> > --
> > Brad Gallagher
> > ASCI Flash Center
> > jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu
> >
> >
> >

--
Brad Gallagher
ASCI Flash Center
jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/parallel-netcdf/attachments/20030828/172c24f0/attachment.htm>