0.8.9 on QSC (ASCi Q)

[Jianwei Li]

Brad,

I checked and found that Bill just said you can bypass the fortran
interface since you don't need it.

And here is the following answer from Tyce about how to bypass it:)

Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:35:10 -0700
From: Tyce Mclarty <mclarty3 at llnl.gov>
To: JB Gallagher <jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu>,
jianwei at ece.northwestern.edu,
     rross at mcs.anl.gov, parallel-netcdf at mcs.anl.gov,
     jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu
Subject: Re: Compiling parallel-netcdf 0.8.9 on QSC (ASCI Q)

Can't you use the -i8 fortran flag to force 64 bit integers, so it will
pass the configure test?

 From f90 man page:

   -i8         Makes default integer and logical variables 8-bytes long
(same
               as the -integer_size 64 option).  The default is
-integer_size
               32.

Tyce



Hope it will help you through.

---

Jianwei

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, JB Gallagher wrote:

> All,
>
> I posted a question to the list a while ago about building the newest
> parallel-netcdf on ASCI Q, I believe Bill Gropp got back to me on my
> problem, but I can no longer find his reply. I'm running into a problem
> with the configure:
>
> checking whether size_t and int size match... no
> configure: error: This is a critical error; please report this size
> mismatch to the developers!
>
> And I believe Bill said something to the effect that this was put in for
> checks in building the fortran interface and implied that if I didn't
> need the fortran interface (which I currently don't) I could bypass this
> check. Can anyone help me with this?
>
> After getting some mpi issues out of the way, I am able to get a really
> old version of parallel netcdf built on Q, but it doesn't work reliably
> on greater than 8 processors.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Brad
>
> --
> Brad Gallagher
> ASCI Flash Center
> jbgallag at flash.uchicago.edu
>
>
>