[mpich-discuss] COMM_SELF and collective IO

[burlen]

I could then I will have to have two codes with only a one line difference.

Rajeev Thakur wrote:
> Why don't you just use MPI_File_read instead?
>
> Rajeev 
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov 
>> [mailto:mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of burlen
>> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:39 PM
>> To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
>> Subject: [mpich-discuss] COMM_SELF and collective IO
>>
>> I have an io code that uses the subarray type. I use the 
>> collective IO function, MPI_File_read_all. Now, I have a use 
>> case where each process needs to read independently of the 
>> others. What I am tempted to do is change the communicator to 
>> MPI_COMM_SELF and use the same code. I suspect that this is a 
>> bad idea. Is it?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpich-discuss mailing list
>> mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list
> mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>