[mpich-discuss] COMM_SELF and collective IO
Rajeev Thakur
thakur at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Oct 16 18:53:37 CDT 2009
Why don't you just use MPI_File_read instead?
Rajeev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov
> [mailto:mpich-discuss-bounces at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of burlen
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 5:39 PM
> To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> Subject: [mpich-discuss] COMM_SELF and collective IO
>
> I have an io code that uses the subarray type. I use the
> collective IO function, MPI_File_read_all. Now, I have a use
> case where each process needs to read independently of the
> others. What I am tempted to do is change the communicator to
> MPI_COMM_SELF and use the same code. I suspect that this is a
> bad idea. Is it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpich-discuss mailing list
> mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>
More information about the mpich-discuss
mailing list