[AG-TECH] video consumer vic not always receive feeds... the video producer vic does instead
Natalia Costas
natalia at cesga.es
Mon May 8 10:30:27 CDT 2006
Ah, yes.. i forgot to tell about the bridge...
We will use our "workaround" meanwhile it is not solved.
Thax a lot Tom!
Thomas D. Uram escribió:
> Natalia:
>
> It sounds like you are using a bridge. If so, the problem is that the
> bridge only
> sends data to a single application per machine, so only one of your
> vic instances
> will get video data from the bridge. This is a known bug in our
> bugzilla.
>
> If you are not using a bridge, please let us know, as this would be some
> strange behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> Natalia Costas wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> Giving a hand to our collegues at the University of Extremadura, we
>> found a problem. Maybe someone knows the solution. The problem arises
>> with a one machine node with two capture cards:
>>
>> They have 2 videoproducer services + 1 videoconsumer. The problem is
>> that the videofeeds go to any of the vics (video producer of
>> videoconsumer) randomly... so.. sometimes the videoconsumer vic
>> receives nothing (but the videoproducer vic does), and it starts
>> receiving the feeds only when i close one of the video producer vics.
>>
>> The only workaround i've found is to add 2 video services (so any of
>> them receive the feeds and are unmuted). Both receive all the feeds,
>> but i dont like that solution very much. I am afraid it might have
>> some impact on performance (the videostreams are delivered to two
>> different applications...)
>>
>> Thanx a lot in advance,
>> Kind regards.
>>
>
>
--
=================================================
Natalia Costas Lago
E-mail: natalia at cesga.es
Centro de Supercomputacion de Galicia (CESGA)
Avenida de Vigo, s/n (Campus Sur)
15705 Santiago de Compostela - SPAIN
Tel: +34 981 56 98 10
Fax: +34 981 59 46 16
http://www.cesga.es/
=================================================
More information about the ag-tech
mailing list