Trusted certs - was: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?

[Ivan R. Judson]

Supreeya,

Have you seen this in the 2.2 software? I think that's what Jon is trying --
but if you've seen it in 2.2 please let us know so we can fix it before the
final release.

--Ivan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov 
> [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Supreeya Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 3:37 PM
> To: ACCESS community; Jon Johansson
> Subject: RE: Trusted certs - was: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and 
> above on Win2K?
> 
> Jon,
> 
> Your certificate is probably ok.  It is a bug of this version 
> that the certificate was imported, but somehow the trusted 
> certificate did not get done properly.
> 
> Here what I did (by the help from Robert Olson):
> 	1. Run the Venue Client,
> 	2. Click on Preferences > Manage Certificates > View 
> Identity Certificate,
> 		(Since I had problem, I requested many certs.)
> 	   Keep the certificate that I knew for sure what the 
> password was and deleted the rest (I could have exported them 
> for other uses.)
> 	3. Click on Preferences again, choose Manage 
> Certificates > View Trusted CA certificates.
> 	   At this point I think I clicked on Import.  Then I 
> got the trusted certificates imported.
> Then it logged me in immediately without asking for a passphrase.
> 
> After that I had no problem using the AG2.
> 
> Supreeya Miller
> Visualization Researcher, System Administrator, and Access 
> Grid Coordinator Center of Higher Learning Building 1103 
> Stennis Space Center, MS  39529 228-688-2190 Internal Mail 
> Box: 10002 Supreeya.Miller at usm.edu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Johansson [mailto:jon.johansson at ualberta.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 2:18 PM
> To: 'Supreeya Miller'
> Subject: Trusted certs - was: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?
> 
> 
> 
> I'm getting a password error on a WinXP machine with the same 
> user certs that I use on other machines.
> I've checked that the certs that I imported are not corrupted 
> and my configuration seems ok.
> How do I check the trusted certs and where do I get them if 
> they don't come with the installation?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon.
> 
> --
> Jon I Johansson             *  Research Computing Support
> jon.johansson at ualberta.ca   *  Computing and Network Services
> Tel.: (780) 492-9304        *  University of Alberta
> Fax.: (780) 492-1729        *  Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Supreeya Miller
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:58 PM
> > To: Randy Groves; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?
> >
> >
> > Randy,
> >
> > At CHL, we are running a room node with 4 machines.  The Display 
> > machine is running Windows 2000.
> >
> > The 2.1.2 installation was easy and smooth.  However, I had an 
> > installation problem on a PIG XP that it did not have a trusted 
> > certificate and reported as having a bad password entered instead.
> >
> > Supreeya Miller
> > Visualization Researcher, System Administrator, and Access Grid 
> > Coordinator Center of Higher Learning Building 1103 Stennis Space 
> > Center, MS  39529 228-688-2190 Internal Mail Box: 10002 
> > Supreeya.Miller at usm.edu
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov]On
> > Behalf Of Randy Groves
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:44 AM
> > To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: [AG-TECH] AG2.2 and above on Win2K?
> >
> >
> > First of all, are people successfully running 2.1.2 on Win2K?
> >  I've had
> > some problems recently getting it running on this platform 
> - at this 
> > juncture, I don't remember the details.  But this issue looks like 
> > it's going to raise it's head again, so I'll probably have 
> to revisit 
> > it.
> >
> > But that brings up a larger question, which is significant in our 
> > situation, where XP is just now starting to be installed in 
> selected 
> > areas.  Is Win2K a dead platform as far as the AG is concerned?
> >
> > -randy
> >
> 
>