[AG-TECH] Will the Moo resurface?
DAAgarwal at lbl.gov
Fri Apr 23 16:57:47 CDT 2004
I actually think we should consider moving to a jabber (XMPP-based)
chat instead. This would provide something that worked inside and
outside the AG and had many other modern features. I plan to
present this position at the AG retreat. This presentation would
provide a good opportunity for us all to discuss what we want to
have chat be in the future and what capabilities it should have.
Michael Daw wrote:
> It seems to me that the Mud is the only interoperational text chat there is.
> In meetings that I have any hand in organising, I insist on people using the
> Mud, whether they're using AG1, AG2, VRVS, vic & rat, or the Insors Grid. It
> would be great to see it re-integrated into the standard ANL software...
>>From: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>>[mailto:owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Randy Groves
>>Sent: 23 April 2004 01:01
>>To: ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>>Subject: [AG-TECH] Will the Moo resurface?
>>An interesting observation - how many people still do their
>>back chat in the Mud and not in the AG2 message facility?
>>How many people prefer the Mud? Any plans to re-incorporate
>>the Mud into the AG?
Deb Agarwal e-mail:DAAgarwal at lbl.gov
MS50B-2239 phone :(510)486-7078
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab URL: http://www-itg.lbl.gov/~deba
Berkeley, CA 94720
More information about the ag-tech