[AG-TECH] MSB and Linux

Jay Beavers jbeavers at microsoft.com
Fri Aug 17 11:19:53 CDT 2001

I did some trials with the previous generation under Windows XP in
'Windows 98 Compatibility Mode' and it ran for most functions, but the
matrix displayed an application error when I brought it up.  I haven't
tried the newer software yet.

 - jcb

-----Original Message-----
From: Kabe Vanderbaan [mailto:Kabe_VanderBaan-KVANDER2 at email.mot.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Jay Beavers
Cc: Toerless Eckert; Robert Olson; Bill Nickless; Mark Hereld; kabev;
ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] MSB and Linux

Have you had any experience with the gentner software on Windows XP? Run
well?  Bad?


Jay Beavers wrote:
> FYI, I've just confirmed that if you install VPN on Windows XP Server,

> place it on the Internet2, and have it hand out Internet2 addresses, 
> you can VPN into the box from an Internet1 computer and send/receive 
> multicast RTP traffic.
> This gets us dial-up style authentication on an individual 
> username/password basis and is also compatible with hardware 
> authentication systems such as smart cards.
> This is the technique we'll be trying at Microsoft Research for our 
> Internet2/Corporate Network conference bridging.
>  - jcb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toerless Eckert [mailto:eckert at cisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 5:43 PM
> To: Robert Olson
> Cc: Bill Nickless; Mark Hereld; kabev; ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov; Toerless 
> Eckert
> Subject: Re: [AG-TECH] MSB and Linux
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:28:45PM -0500, Robert Olson wrote:
> > Did he know if the VPN boxes did indeed support multicast? Perhaps 
> > we should look into what it might take (say, for the porta-ag..)
> Well, i wasn't really thinking about VPN boxes directly, i was rather 
> thinking about L2TP tunnel into an aggregation router (or some 
> dedicated VPN box, right, but yes - i do not know if those support
> ip multicast). The main point is to have the tunnel endpoint software
> available on the
> designated end system platform, and L2TP seems to be the most commonly
> available, but Bill
> also said that with your particular platform (Linux at least in one
> system, GRE might also be
> an option. The advantage of L2TP for larger scaling setups is the
> style user authentication
> you can typically configure, whereas GRE is always statically
> and authentication is only
> via ip address of the remote endpoint.
> Cheers
>         Toerless

Kabe VanderBaan, Research Engineer
Networks and Infrastructure Research, Motorola Labs 
Phone: 847-576-1832              
Cell: 847-980-4100

More information about the ag-tech mailing list