current thoughts on toolkit initialization issues

[Robert Olson]

This isn't new stuff, this is stuff wrapping up code that's already in 
there that's done inconsistently. I can leave logging out if you want, but 
it's not a big deal.

At 03:50 PM 5/8/2003 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:

>I forget the thing I asked about yesterday, but that might be what's
>missing.
>
>I'm very concerned that this is a significant amount of new stuff that
>touches a lot of parts of the current code.  What is the minimal set of
>things we *have* to do for 2.0 vs the best (most complete, etc) solution?
>
>I think we need to do the minimal solution so we don't destabilize stuff,
>for example I think making logging initialize more cleanly is a good idea,
>but it is working now well enough.
>
>Thoughts?
>
>--Ivan
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Robert Olson
> > Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 11:12 AM
> > To: ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
> > Subject: current thoughts on toolkit initialization issues
> >
> >
> > Hm, there was another issue that I'm forgetting. Will have to
> > add when I
> > remember what it is.
> >
> > --bob
> >