"new" requirement

[Ivan R. Judson]

Now I'm really confused. So the DataStoreClient is something you've had for
over a month and fills the requirement, but you argued it was something we
had to develop. The arguing it's something we have to develop is the reason
you needed to send requirements. If you'd had it, why not just say "By the
way, XXX does this for me now, it's a good example of what I'm asking for."
?
 
--Ivan
 
PS -- These conversations are usually significantly faster and higher
throughput in person, I'm only 2 doors away and I've never bitten anyone. I
might argue alot, but we've survived that before.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Disz [mailto:disz at mcs.anl.gov] 
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:02 AM
To: judson at mcs.anl.gov; ag-dev at mcs.anl.gov
Subject: RE: "new" requirement


Well, yes, the datastoreclient does most of what is needed, in fact that is
what I am using, but in a private cvs copy I have. It does a fine job so
far. But on the mud yesterday you were arguing that this requirement had not
been addressed, was difficult, unreasonable, etc, so I figured I had better
email it in as you suggested.
 
 The problem is one we have all discussed many times:  we have a file or
files in the venue that we do not want to download in their entirety or are
too large to download in their entirety. So we need an interface to allow us
to read the file in part, or in whole, from the venue. I also have the case
where I am building files that are very large and would like to deliver them
directly to the venue instead of creating them locally and then transferring
them. 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20030822/0e61408c/attachment.htm>