[petsc-dev] memory leak

Matthew Knepley knepley at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 07:47:57 CDT 2015


On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:

>
>>
>> Right before you make the branch from master, you should pull. If you
>> pull, you will be 0 commits ahead.
>>
>>
> Matt, I am not branching from master.  I have checked out maint in the
> past week, but don't even think I have do that this clone.
>

Send the command that you used to create the branch.

  Thanks,

    Matt


> Anyway, I've blown it away and am starting with a fresh clone.
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
>
>>    Matt
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> from another branch, at least I did not knowingly.  I am tempted to
>>>>> just start with a fresh clone and redo this whole thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is going on here?  Did I sleep walk last night and pull from next?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I just push this to master (I tested it and it is a trivial
>>>>> change) or should I reclone. etc.?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> 19:10 edison03 master ~/petsc$ git status
>>>>> # On branch master
>>>>> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 7 commits.
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Changes not staged for commit:
>>>>> #   (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
>>>>> #   (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working
>>>>> directory)
>>>>> #
>>>>> #       modified:
>>>>> src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/ftn-custom/zfieldsplitf.c
>>>>> #
>>>>> no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
>>>>> 19:10 edison03 master ~/petsc$ git commit
>>>>> src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/ftn-custom/zfieldsplitf.c -m"fixed memory leak"
>>>>> [master d4dcd7b] fixed memory leak
>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>> 19:10 edison03 master ~/petsc$ git pull origin master
>>>>> From https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc
>>>>>  * branch            master     -> FETCH_HEAD
>>>>> Already up-to-date.
>>>>> 19:11 edison03 master ~/petsc$ git status
>>>>> # On branch master
>>>>> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 8 commits.
>>>>> #
>>>>> nothing to commit (working directory clean)
>>>>> 19:11 edison03 master ~/petsc$
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is coming from this line (last):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #undef __FUNCT__
>>>>>> #define __FUNCT__ "PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP_FieldSplit_Schur"
>>>>>> static PetscErrorCode  PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP_FieldSplit_Schur(PC
>>>>>> pc,PetscInt *n,KSP **subksp)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>   PC_FieldSplit  *jac = (PC_FieldSplit*)pc->data;
>>>>>>   PetscErrorCode ierr;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   PetscFunctionBegin;
>>>>>>   ierr = PetscMalloc1(jac->nsplits,subksp);CHKERRQ(ierr);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I call it with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   KSP::subksp(2)
>>>>>>  ....
>>>>>>   call PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP(solver%pc,PETSC_NULL_INTEGER,subksp,ierr)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Fortran wrapper is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PETSC_EXTERN void PETSC_STDCALL pcfieldsplitgetsubksp_(PC
>>>>>> *pc,PetscInt *n_local,KSP *ksp,PetscErrorCode *ierr)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>   KSP      *tksp;
>>>>>>   PetscInt i,nloc;
>>>>>>   CHKFORTRANNULLINTEGER(n_local);
>>>>>>   *ierr = PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP(*pc,&nloc,&tksp); if (*ierr) return;
>>>>>>   if (n_local) *n_local = nloc;
>>>>>>   CHKFORTRANNULLOBJECT(ksp);
>>>>>>   if (ksp) {
>>>>>>     for (i=0; i<nloc; i++) ksp[i] = tksp[i];
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I just add a PetscFree(&tksp) here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Need more details. How can we reproduce this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was hoping this would be obvious. a missed free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What tests use Schur solvers?  I could see if they have the same
>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Barry
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > On May 30, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > This look like there might be a memory leak in PETSc.  Let me
>>>>>>>> know if this is not obvious and get more detail.
>>>>>>>> > Mark
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [0]Total space allocated 16 bytes
>>>>>>>> > [ 0]16 bytes PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP_FieldSplit_Schur() line 1263
>>>>>>>> in /global/u2/m/madams/petsc/src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/fieldsplit.c
>>>>>>>> >       [0]  PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP_FieldSplit_Schur() line 1263 in
>>>>>>>> /global/u2/m/madams/petsc/src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/fieldsplit.c
>>>>>>>> >       [0]  PCFieldSplitGetSubKSP() line 1665 in
>>>>>>>> /global/u2/m/madams/petsc/src/ksp/pc/impls/fieldsplit/fieldsplit.c
>>>>>>>> >       [0]  KSPSetUp() line 247 in
>>>>>>>> /global/u2/m/madams/petsc/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>>> experiments lead.
>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150601/9668de04/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-dev mailing list