[petsc-dev] who did this?

[Jed Brown]

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
>
> > This is years old, but in any case, fixed now:
> http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/30f9a34e118e
>
>    How can it possibly be years old? You're saying that this message has
> appeared every night during the nightly tests and every time someone did
> make alltests and during every test Satish made before the release?
>

Oops, I read "hg annotate" incorrectly. It was in

http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/2ab3e57475d7

which was merged in

http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/9dfe4a92ca2c

I don't understand the motivation for unrolling the shell loop, but then
referencing a file that doesn't match the target name.


>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0:
> `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 1 ./ex37
> -explicit_is 0 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_1.out
> ex37_1.tmp || echo
>  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible
> problem with ex37_1, diffs above
> \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f
> ex37_1.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37] Error 2 (ignored)
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0:
> `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 1 ./ex37
> -explicit_is 1 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_1.out
> ex37_1.tmp || echo
>  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible
> problem with ex37_1, diffs above
> \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f
> ex37_1.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37_1] Error 2 (ignored)
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0:
> `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 2 ./ex37
> -explicit_is 0 > ex37_2.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_2.out
> ex37_2.tmp || echo
>  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible
> problem with ex37_2, diffs above
> \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f
> ex37_2.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37_2] Error 2 (ignored)
> >
> > At least test your rule before pushing
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120705/67902725/attachment.html>