[petsc-dev] who did this?

[Satish Balay]

This issue is not in petsc-3.3 but looks like it was introduced at:

http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/2ab3e57475d7

I switched nightly builds back from petsc33 to petsc-dev on june 27-ish..

satish

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> 
> > This is years old, but in any case, fixed now: http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/30f9a34e118e
> 
>    How can it possibly be years old? You're saying that this message has appeared every night during the nightly tests and every time someone did make alltests and during every test Satish made before the release?
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > 
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 1 ./ex37 -explicit_is 0 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_1.out ex37_1.tmp || echo  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible problem with ex37_1, diffs above \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f ex37_1.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37] Error 2 (ignored)
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 1 ./ex37 -explicit_is 1 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_1.out ex37_1.tmp || echo  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible problem with ex37_1, diffs above \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f ex37_1.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37_1] Error 2 (ignored)
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done'
> > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec -n 2 ./ex37 -explicit_is 0 > ex37_2.tmp 2>&1;    /usr/bin/diff -w output/ex37_2.out ex37_2.tmp || echo  /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible problem with ex37_2, diffs above \n=========================================";   done; /bin/rm -f -f ex37_2.tmp'
> > make[7]: [runex37_2] Error 2 (ignored)
> > 
> > At least test your rule before pushing
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>