[petsc-dev] petsc-dev on bitbucket

[Barry Smith]

On Feb 8, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Satish Balay wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Barry Smith wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Sean Farley wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm sure Jed (or Matt in his prime) could have run over to IIT and restarted the machine in less time than this :-)
>>> 
>>> Sure, and like everybody else they would have had to wait outside until they had keys :-)
>> 
>>   Those guys are very resourceful; I cannot image a simple locked door would be an issue for them.
>> 
>>   Barry
>> 
>>   Besides who the heck set up the machine so it cannot be started remotely? Should have used an Apple machine :-)
> 
> 
> It was a human error [when you tell something to shutdown - it should not automatically restart].
> 
> yeah - if we installed server infrastructure with remote admin feature
> - then it could have been powered up remotely [from the remote
> management console or something like that..]

   Isn't that a basic Linux thing, start on LANS signal.

> 
> looks like folks [Sean,Matt,Barry] are happy with bitbucket.

   Not me. I'm not happy with it.  I prefer the PETSc machine, bitbucket is just a back up when the PETSc machine goes down. If the PETSc machine is back up then we switch the master repository back.

   Barry

> 
> Sean - you'll have to transfer all repos and keys to the new site.
> 
> For now - I've removed petsc-dev and BuildSystem from petsc.cs.iit -
> and will plan a phased shutdown of the machine - as soon as you can
> find new home for all repos.
> 
> Satish