[Nek5000-users] MPI_TAG_UB too small

nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Fri Apr 3 13:22:24 CDT 2015


Dear Philipp,

I see. Thank you very much for the explanation. It would be great if you could help me make relevant changes or send me the files you mentioned if that is at all possible.

Best regards,
Tony

________________________________________
From: nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users-bounces at lists.mcs.anl.gov> on behalf of nek5000-users-request at lists.mcs.anl.gov <nek5000-users-request at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
Sent: 03 April 2015 18:00
To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Nek5000-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 2

Send Nek5000-users mailing list submissions to
        nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        nek5000-users-request at lists.mcs.anl.gov

You can reach the person managing the list at
        nek5000-users-owner at lists.mcs.anl.gov

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Nek5000-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. MPI_TAG_UB too small (nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov)
   2. Re: MPI_TAG_UB too small (nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 12:04:14 +0000
From: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
To: "nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov"
        <nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
Subject: [Nek5000-users] MPI_TAG_UB too small
Message-ID:
        <mailman.1264.1428062661.14701.nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear Neks,


I'm having a problem running my simulation with thousands of processors. In my case, I have 6090000 elements and I ran the simulation with 8520 procs. However, the simulation aborted with the error message 'MPI_TAG_UB too small'.


I checked the code and found that if "nval.lt.(10000+max(lp,lelg))", the simulation would abort. But in the subroutine 'mpi_attr_get', ival is set to be 9999999. In this case, nval should be larger than 10000+max(lp,lelg). So, why did the simulation not run?


 Hope anyone can help me on this. Thank you very much.


Best regards,

Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/nek5000-users/attachments/20150403/8f2d0483/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:04:16 +0200
From: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
To: nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [Nek5000-users] MPI_TAG_UB too small
Message-ID:
        <mailman.1287.1428077071.14701.nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed

Dear all,

indeed, we have experienced the same problem with the recent Cray MPI
Library; the maximum tag size was reduced to 2**21 (the MPI standard
requires 2^16, but most libraries have 2^32). The problem in Nek is that
in the initial distribution of the mesh and velocities onto the
processors, the element number is used as a message tag, which obviously
fails if you have more than 2**21 elements. The check you mention
(nval.lt.(10000+max(lp,lelg)) is exactly checking that (mpi_dummf.f is
only used in serial runs, in parallel runs mpi_attr_get is a routine
provided by the current mpi library and returns the maximum tag number
of the implementation).

Anyway, we have recently fixed this problem by changing the way the tag
is used (local element number vs global one). Maybe the easiest would be
to merge these changes in the repo? Otherwise, I can also send the
changed files, but then of course one has to be careful to have matching
revisions.

Best regards,
Philipp

On 2015-04-03 14:04, nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov wrote:
> Dear Neks,
>
>
> I'm having a problem running my simulation with thousands of processors.
> In my case, I have 6090000 elements and I ran the simulation with 8520
> procs. However, the simulation aborted with the error message
> 'MPI_TAG_UB too small'.
>
>
> I checked the code and found that if "nval.lt.(10000+max(lp,lelg))", the
> simulation would abort. But in the subroutine 'mpi_attr_get', ival is
> set to be 9999999. In this case, nval should be larger than
> 10000+max(lp,lelg). So, why did the simulation not run?
>
>
> Hope anyone can help me on this. Thank you very much.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nek5000-users mailing list
> Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users
>


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Nek5000-users mailing list
Nek5000-users at lists.mcs.anl.gov
https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/nek5000-users


End of Nek5000-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 2
********************************************


More information about the Nek5000-users mailing list