[Swift-user] Re: oops failures on OSG

[Zhengxiong Hou]

OK.
BTW,  Please send me the command to run oops, I'm going to run it on OSG VO.
            swift -tc.file tc.data -sites.file sites.xml oops7.swift 
(and -params=???)
> Should we ask the swift user group?
>
> Zhengxiong Hou wrote:
>>   Yes, I also found it from the log file.
>>   Since it failed on UCSDT2-B, Swift should retried it, but it was 
>> still failed, and I 'm not exactly clear why all of the rest jobs 
>> were failed. So, it is swift staff.
>>   Maybe, we had better use the "replication" mechanism of Swift.
>>
>> Glen Hocky wrote:
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:22 Finished successfully:51
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:22 Finished successfully:51
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:22 Finished successfully:51
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:22 Finished successfully:51
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:22 Finished successfully:51
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:27 Active:21 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:26 Active:22 Finished successfully:52
>>> Progress:  Submitted:26 Active:22 Finished successfully:52
>>> Failed to transfer wrapper log from 
>>> oops7-20090219-1827-6gqbuh81/info/o on UCSDT2-B
>>> Progress:  Submitted:26 Active:21 Failed:1 Finished successfully:52
>>> Execution failed:
>>>        Exception in runoops:
>>> Arguments: [input/fasta/T1di2.fasta, input/secseq/T1di2.secseq, 
>>> input/native/T1di2.pdb, output/T1di2.26.pdt, output/T1di2.26.rmsd, 
>>> 26, TEMP UPDATE INTERVAL = 10, SMOOTH DEVIATION COEFFICIENT = 0.80001]
>>> Host: UCSDT2-B
>>> Directory: oops7-20090219-1827-6gqbuh81/jobs/o/runoops-on95pu6j
>>> stderr.txt:
>>>
>>> stdout.txt:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Zhengxiong Hou wrote:
>>>> Hi Glen,
>>>>     For that 100 jobs run, I checked the results and turned them 
>>>> into plots, not more than 60 jobs were finished successfully.
>>>>     So, we should try to find the reasons for the failures.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Zhengxiong
>>>
>>
>