[Swift-devel] CDM Tests

[Ketan Maheshwari]

Mike,

In my initial email I said:

... when specifying the relative option on the config for
wrapper.invocation.mode
property the script works regardless of the paths of input/output.

Which made me conclude that the option specified in the config for
wrapper.invocation.mode
property overrides the CDM policies.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael Wilde <wilde at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Ketan,
>
> I thought your initial email stated that the 4 cases of relative path
> names "worked".  But this latter comment indicates that there is some kind
> of problem even in the relative cases.
>
> Can you clarify?
>
> - Mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ketan Maheshwari" <ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com>
> > To: "Justin M Wozniak" <wozniak at mcs.anl.gov>
> > Cc: "Michael Wilde" <wilde at mcs.anl.gov>, "Swift Devel" <
> swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 11:01:35 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > Given the CDM's support for relative pathnames, I would expect the
> > case of relative inputs, relative outputs would succeed irrespective
> > of config. However, from the tests, it seems that the config option is
> > overriding CDM directives.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Justin M Wozniak <
> > wozniak at mcs.anl.gov > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > CDM DIRECT does not currently support absolute path names. I think we
> > could provide something simple like "" for the field, as you suggest.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Michael Wilde wrote:
> >
> > > I would expect that for absolute path mappings, the user would
> > > specify
> > > either :: or "/" as the path in the CDM DIRECT pattern. In other
> > > words,
> > > the user is saying "I have mapped the object to an absolute path
> > > name,
> > > and I want the app to get exactly this name". Hence I think that the
> > > best "location" field for a DIRECT rule is null ("").
> > >
> > > Justin, can you clarify what the code expects for this case?
> > >
> > > - Mike
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Jonathan Monette" < jonmon at mcs.anl.gov >
> > >> To: "Michael Wilde" < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > >> Cc: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >, "Swift
> > >> Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > >> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:13:01 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > >> I couldn't tell from the excel(using my phone) but what was
> > >> absolute?
> > >> If I am not mistaken what CDM does is takes the path that is
> > >> specified
> > >> in the CDM file(which should be absolute) and appends the file path
> > >> that is used in the swift script to it(which should be relative).
> > >> So
> > >> if they are both absolute I would expect it to fail.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Michael Wilde < wilde at mcs.anl.gov >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Thanks, Ketan - very nice tests and summary document.
> > >>>
> > >>> I should point out for those that didn't open the doc: the 4 tests
> > >>> with absolute pathnames are failing.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ketan, can you work with Justin to see if this is a bug, or if the
> > >>> CDM directive needs to be coded differently for absolute paths?
> > >>> Then
> > >>> please test a fix, and as we discussed adapt the tests with
> > >>> annotations to enhance the User Guide section on CDM.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Mike
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>> From: "Ketan Maheshwari" < ketancmaheshwari at gmail.com >
> > >>>> To: "Swift Devel" < swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu >
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 8:13:48 AM
> > >>>> Subject: [Swift-devel] CDM Tests
> > >>>> Hello,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I had a discussion with Mike about testing the CDM behavior for
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> following cases:
> > >>>> 1. full versus relative paths for input
> > >>>> 2. full versus relative paths for output
> > >>>> 3. relative versus absolute option in config property:
> > >>>> wrapper.invocation.mode
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In this regard, I made 8 tests for all the above combinations. I
> > >>>> used
> > >>>> simple local provider in this first set of tests.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> From the tests it seems that when specifying the relative option
> > >>>> on
> > >>>> the config for wrapper.invocation.mode property the script works
> > >>>> regardless of the paths of input/output.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> A detailed result with stdout, and paths to logs can be found
> > >>>> here:
> > >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmvYSwENKFY9dG44V2VjRXJlUmZLNG9saERFeWZDcUE
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The tests are in my CI dir: /home/ketan/cdm_tests
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards, --
> > >>>> Ketan
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Swift-devel mailing list
> > >>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > >>>> https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Michael Wilde
> > >>> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > >>> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > >>> Argonne National Laboratory
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Swift-devel mailing list
> > >>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > >>> https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Justin M Wozniak
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Swift-devel mailing list
> > Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > https://lists.ci.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ketan
>
> --
> Michael Wilde
> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
>


-- 
Ketan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20111114/02922a14/attachment.html>