[Swift-devel] [Fwd: [pads-users] Mounting homes read-only on computes]

Mihael Hategan hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Apr 19 00:15:55 CDT 2011


On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 00:05 -0500, Allan Espinosa wrote:
> Oh right worker logs.  I was thinking of the submit files (pbs or
> condor).  sorry

Crap. In general, the pbs scripts are only needed on node that you
submit from. So they should probably go in $TMP if we want to submit
from the CNs, but that can probably be "hardcoded". The coaster worker
script should still be readable on the compute nodes. But we may want to
also make that a configurable option (though I'd wait for that
sufficiently messed up cluster that requires it).

> 
> 2011/4/19 Mihael Hategan <hategan at mcs.anl.gov>:
> > You'd want that to be configurable for each site (each may have its SFS
> > mounted somewhere else). That would suggest it might go in the sites
> > file.
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 23:55 -0500, Allan Espinosa wrote:
> >> The workdirectory of a site and client host maybe on different
> >> machines.  My guess is that it should be something in the
> >> etc/swift.properties file
> >>
> >> 2011/4/18 Jonathan S Monette <jonmon at utexas.edu>:
> >> > What about the work directory?
> >> >
> >> > On Apr 18, 2011 9:28 PM, "Mihael Hategan" <hategan at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> >> >> It should be a configurable parameter. I was thinking more like gpfs,
> >> >> but it should be the user's choice.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 18:53 -0700, Sarah Kenny wrote:
> >> >>> /var/tmp ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Mihael Hategan <hategan at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> I guess we should allow worker logs to go in some other place
> >> >>> than
> >> >>> ~.globus/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Mihael
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> >> >>> From: pads-users at ci.uchicago.edu
> >> >>> Reply-to: pads-users at ci.uchicago.edu
> >> >>> To: pads-users at ci.uchicago.edu
> >> >>> Subject: [pads-users] Mounting homes read-only on computes
> >> >>> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:00:40 -0500
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> One of the things discussed as part of the post-mortem of
> >> >>> today's home file server outage is mounting home directories
> >> >>> read-only on the compute nodes. We do this on Beagle and
> >> >>> haven't had any complaints for the most part. So I wanted to
> >> >>> solicit you to see how disruptive that might be to your
> >> >>> current PADS work. Homes would still be mounted read-write on
> >> >>> the login machines, but they wouldn't be writable on the
> >> >>> computes. The alternative is to push your writes to either
> >> >>> GPFS or the local scratch filesystems. If we don't hear any
> >> >>> major complaints about this, we're targeting next month's
> >> >>> maintenance to make this live. What are your thoughts on this?
> >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> >>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> iEYEARECAAYFAk2qV9gACgkQ4RgdOxQVi0CovACfW20YM0R8uexD5PeHoX6QGZc3
> >> >>> LOwAnR3Iv1tokCpM81T56kSGrLNuniKg
> >> >>> =c5Y+
> >> >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>
> >>
> >





More information about the Swift-devel mailing list