[Swift-devel] Re: [Swift-commit] r4363 - branches

[Michael Wilde]

Also, will there be a swift_0.92.1 tag in CoG SVN? It would be nice to have identical tag names to check out under both repositories. 


- Mike 

----- Original Message -----


they should get it directly from tags instead of svn co https://svn.ci.uchicago.edu/svn/vdl2/branches/release-0.92 swift ? 


On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Mihael Hategan < hategan at mcs.anl.gov > wrote: 



On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:09 -0700, Sarah Kenny wrote: 
> alrighty, so, does this seem right to everyone? 

Almost. The instructions for checking out the source code are not quite 
right. 



> 
> http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/~skenny/swift/downloads/index.php 
> 
> i'm doing a run thru of the site tester now building from 
> tags/release-0.92.1 as a sanity test and assuming all goes well that's 
> what i will use to build the binary. 
> 
> let me know if this sounds ok or if i'm missing anything here. 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Mihael Hategan < hategan at mcs.anl.gov > 
> wrote: 
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 -0700, Sarah Kenny wrote: 
> > and should the binary then still be called 0.92 rather than 
> 0.92.1 ? 
> 
> 
> The binary would be called 0.92.1. 
> > 
> > being that 0.92 had such a substantial flaw and a warning 
> was posted 
> > on the site, it seems to me that we'd want to make it clear 
> (to users) 
> > that this is a new version/release by naming it 
> 0.92.1...does tagging 
> > adequately solve this? 
> 
> 
> Tagging doesn't solve that. Tagging is there so that we can 
> have some 
> label in SVN that matches the packages that we release as 
> opposed to 
> having to track a specific revision in the branch. 
> > 
> 
> 
> 






-- 
Michael Wilde 
Computation Institute, University of Chicago 
Mathematics and Computer Science Division 
Argonne National Laboratory 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20110413/90950f1d/attachment.html>