[Swift-devel] Re: [Swift-commit] r4363 - branches

[Sarah Kenny]

alrighty, so, does this seem right to everyone?

http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/~skenny/swift/downloads/index.php

i'm doing a run thru of the site tester now building from
tags/release-0.92.1 as a sanity test and assuming all goes well that's what
i will use to build the binary.

let me know if this sounds ok or if i'm missing anything here.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Mihael Hategan <hategan at mcs.anl.gov>wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 -0700, Sarah Kenny wrote:
> > and should the binary then still be called 0.92 rather than 0.92.1 ?
>
> The binary would be called 0.92.1.
> >
> > being that 0.92 had such a substantial flaw and a warning was posted
> > on the site, it seems to me that we'd want to make it clear (to users)
> > that this is a new version/release by naming it 0.92.1...does tagging
> > adequately solve this?
>
> Tagging doesn't solve that. Tagging is there so that we can have some
> label in SVN that matches the packages that we release as opposed to
> having to track a specific revision in the branch.
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20110413/fe99fee9/attachment.html>