[Swift-devel] duplicated job submission in swift-0.92?

[Michael Wilde]

And Swift 0.91 works OK - it does *not* exhibit the twice-each bug.

Justin: when you went backwards down the Swift 0.92 branch on Thursday morning, what did you find in terms of where it appeared the bug was introduced?

- Mike


----- Original Message -----
> I think we mist-spoke: The posted release 0.92 also exhibits the
> twice-each bug as far as I acn tell.
> 
> Mihael, Justin: can you test asap to confirm or refute that
> observation?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> - Mike
> 
> which swift: ~/swift/rev/swift-0.92/bin/swift
> 
> com$ swift -version
> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> 
> com$ cd ~/swift/lab
> com$ cat zz3.swift
> int arr[];
> 
> arr[0]=1;
> arr[1]=2;
> 
> foreach a in arr {
> trace("for", a);
> }
> 
> com$ swift zz3.swift
> Swift svn swift-r4157 cog-r3056
> 
> RunID: 20110401-1645-yyy87p39
> Progress:
> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> SwiftScript trace: for, 1
> SwiftScript trace: for, 2
> Final status:
> com$
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > I think both are good as they are.
> >
> > Would you like me to send it?
> >
> > Mihael
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 20:57 -0500, Michael Wilde wrote:
> > > And I will send this to swift-user:
> > >
> > > "Dear Swift Users,
> > >
> > > On March 29 we discovered that the Release 0.92 branches of the
> > > Swift and CoG trees were changed after the release and a
> > > concurrency
> > > bug was introduced. If you are running Swift from this *source
> > > code*
> > > base, please revert back to a known-working release such as the
> > > 0.92
> > > binary release if at all possible.
> > >
> > > We're working on restoring the 0.92 SVN branch to the correct
> > > state
> > > and will report back to this email list when that is done."
> > >
> > > Anything else to say? Feel free to send this out, adjusted as
> > > needed, or just tell me what to change and I will.
> > >
> > > - Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > Please check this proposed warning on the Downloads page and let
> > > > me
> > > > know if its what we need there:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/~wilde/swift/downloads/index.php
> > > >
> > > > I also fixed the 0.91 typo (but the downloads dont actually work
> > > > from
> > > > this test web. I think they will once this is committed and
> > > > pushed
> > > > live).
> > > >
> > > > - Mike
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 20:14 -0500, Michael Wilde wrote:
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > We decided the following:
> > > > > > > > - I will revert the changes in the 0.92 branch
> > > > > > > > - re-commit bug fixes that were committed after the
> > > > > > > > merge
> > > > > > > > - merge the 0.92 branch to trunk
> > > > > > > > - fix the problems in trunk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good. But when and how does the fix get to users?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The package(s) are fine. Though we should probably also have
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > source
> > > > > > package. The merge was done after the package(s) were
> > > > > > uploaded
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > swift site.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, great!
> > > > >
> > > > > > This only affects folks who have checked out from SVN the
> > > > > > 0.92
> > > > > > branch
> > > > > > after the merge 9 days (or so) ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm - I question that. The release we use, based on 0.92 on
> > > > > Beagle,
> > > > > shows the twice-each error, and it was made on Feb 25, about
> > > > > 35
> > > > > days
> > > > > ago. Does this merit clarification?
> > > > >
> > > > > > We should send an email to the user list once this is fixed.
> > > > > > We
> > > > > > may
> > > > > > also
> > > > > > want to send an email warning them not to check out from SVN
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > download the precompiled package instead.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK. I cant say that this will reach everyone. Perhaps some
> > > > > status
> > > > > notes on the Download page are in order. The 0.91 link there
> > > > > is
> > > > > wrong,
> > > > > so we need to fix that page anyways.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am a bit confused though. I would have expected the
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > come
> > > > > > with some announcement of some form.
> > > > >
> > > > > Agreed. We kept this low profile because we were trying to
> > > > > coordinate
> > > > > it with a Web change that we never accomplished. And we've
> > > > > lost
> > > > > the
> > > > > habit of swift-user announcements but got to get back to doing
> > > > > that.
> > > > > So, yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Either create a 0.92.1 release (sounds hard based on
> > > > > > > above)
> > > > > > > or create a 0.93 release (in which case should we create
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > 0.93
> > > > > > > branch from trunk as soon as this is fixed?)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How long to re-test? (Thats a question for Sarah, Justin,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > Ketan)
> > > > > > > Could this include the Cray support mods?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No! Fixing a problem is not a venue for introducing untested
> > > > > > things
> > > > > > into
> > > > > > a release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I meant the Cray feature for 0.93 not 0.92.1
> > > > > Yes, that should be tested.
> > > > > But its being used pretty heavily.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > > But it could be discussed separately :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mihael
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Michael Wilde
> > > > > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > > > > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > > > > Argonne National Laboratory
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Swift-devel mailing list
> > > > > Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > > > http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Michael Wilde
> > > > Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> > > > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > > > Argonne National Laboratory
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Swift-devel mailing list
> > > > Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> > > > http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
> > >
> 
> --
> Michael Wilde
> Computation Institute, University of Chicago
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Laboratory
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Swift-devel mailing list
> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel

-- 
Michael Wilde
Computation Institute, University of Chicago
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory