[Swift-devel] progress stats lying
Glen Hocky
hockyg at uchicago.edu
Tue Apr 28 13:25:21 CDT 2009
Agreed. but if they are inaccurate then it is as bad as not having them
at all.
Mihael Hategan wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 13:05 -0500, Glen Hocky wrote:
>
>> as a user, it seems very important to have accurate summary stats so you
>> can tell if anything is going wrong.
>>
>
> You're overgeneralizing. You can infer some things from the summary
> stats, but many things can go wrong even though the summary stats are
> right.
>
>
>> Mihael Hategan wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:15 +0000, Ben Clifford wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Ben Clifford wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> A possible solution is to add another state ("Checking status" or
>>>>>> something), that is triggered in Execute by a task completed event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> r2887 adds a checking status event in execute2, right after the
>>>> vdl:execute call. I think that is sufficient? or are you claiming that
>>>> something deeper in the execute layer is delaying things?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's probably better but not sufficient. With many threads there may be
>>> delays between the vdl:execute call completing and the next thing
>>> running may be visible.
>>>
>>> The problem is that swift may say that more jobs are active than known
>>> possible, which will raise eyebrows.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Swift-devel mailing list
>>> Swift-devel at ci.uchicago.edu
>>> http://mail.ci.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swift-devel
>>>
>>>
>
>
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list