[Swift-devel] workflow run with the newest Swift

[lixi at uchicago.edu]

>The bulk of jobs took bang on 60s to execute on workers, 
with a relatively 
>small number taking much less or more (up to 75s for some) -
 that is 
>plotted in the 'info duration histograph' graph in the 
below URL.

Yes, every successful job should be executed at least for 
60s, because there is a command -- "sleep 60" included in 
the job.

>The log analyser doesn't deal with replication properly 
yet, but it looks 
>like around 10% of jobs (about 200) got replicated.
>
>Looking at per-site stats, it looks like most sites did not 
get more than 
>6 jobs queued/running at once, rather than increasing. One 
site got 12 
>though. I'm interested to know what caused that. I think it 
is your choice 
>of jobThrottle parameter in your sites file generation. My 
rule of thumb 
>has been 20 jobs at once for GRAM2 and a few hundred at 
once for GRAM4; 
>are you specifying a lower job throttle in your submissions?

In this run, I specified 0.05 of job throttle for all the 
sites.

I think that the result of this run is better than past 
situation with the same workflow size.