[Swift-devel] CPU usage with provider-deef
Mihael Hategan
hategan at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jun 17 03:47:38 CDT 2007
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 18:09 -0500, Mike Wilde wrote:
> sorry, I still believe this can be fun. You can tell me afterwards
> if I was right or not.
Fun it is then.
Mihael
>
> I think from Ioan's work we can gain some understanding of the
> problem, of architecture issues, performance potential, and of
> protocol and reliability issues.
>
> I feel it can still be fun to design a new production-quality system
> from scratch, and to prototype and implement that.
>
> Mihael, I think you had a vision of how this could be done elegantly
> using Karajan mechanisms as powerful building blocks to build on, to
> provide the communication and messaging / remote execution fabric.
>
> Ben Clifford wrote, On 6/16/2007 2:36 PM:
> > On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Mihael Hategan wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 12:03 -0500, Mike Wilde wrote:
> >>> This should be fun, and a nice break from the I2U2 work that you've
> >>> been immersed in, Mihael.
> >
> >> I have my reservations towards the amount of fun it involves.
> >
> > Right, taking prototypes and turning them into production isn't
> > necessarily fun - in fact, a lot of the fun already happened with the
> > making of the prototype and the rest is some what drugery. (to an extent
> > that's the same situation i2u2 cosmic was/is in).
>
> I hope its not the case that the only part of programming thats fun
> is prototyping.
>
> If you spend your day in powerpoint, word and email, anything
> related to code can look like fun...
>
> :) Mike
>
>
> >
>
More information about the Swift-devel
mailing list