[Swift-devel] latest Falkon code is in SVN!

[Ioan Raicu]

Thats fine... the current build scripts are more than enough for me at 
the moment.  If this changes in the future, I am sure I or someone else 
will adapt them accordingly.

Ioan

Mihael Hategan wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 10:01 -0500, Ioan Raicu wrote:
>   
>> Right, it should have warned the user that the build failed.  I don't 
>> know how to use the ant build language, and I don't have time right now 
>> to learn it.  If anyone wants to take a stab at reworking my compile 
>> scripts into ant build scripts, I think that would be great!
>>     
>
> Great, but unlikely. I doubt that any of us have appreciably more time
> than you do. It is probably a bit unwise to count on the adoption of
> Falkon if you rely on people understanding its internal details, and
> doing many little things here and there. The little things tend to add
> up to a lot. In our case the choice would boil down to the amount of
> time we spend on Swift vs. the amount of time we spend on non-Swift.
> Should Swift be perfect, the choice would be easy. But it, too, needs
> many little things done here and there. And while there is undeniable
> value in what Falkon does, it is not a blank check.
>
> Mihael
>
>   
>> BTW, about the particular error you saw, the C Executor is a new 
>> experimental implementation that could replace the Java based worker 
>> code and WS-based communication protocol.  If you simply remove the 
>> -static option, it will likely compile; the static option is generally 
>> helpful when you want to compile on one machine and take the binary 
>> elsewhere.  By default, the Java executor code base is used, so even if 
>> the C Executor didn't compile, Falkon could still work from the Java 
>> code base.
>>
>> Ioan
>>
>> Ben Clifford wrote:
>>     
>>> During ./make-falkon.sh I noticed this:
>>>
>>>   Compiling GramClient
>>>   Compiling C Executor
>>>   /usr/bin/ld: can't locate file for: -lcrt0.o
>>>   collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>
>>> It didn't halt the build. It probably should. Probably better to use make 
>>> and/or ant as build language.
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
>   

-- 
============================================
Ioan Raicu
Ph.D. Student
============================================
Distributed Systems Laboratory
Computer Science Department
University of Chicago
1100 E. 58th Street, Ryerson Hall
Chicago, IL 60637
============================================
Email: iraicu at cs.uchicago.edu
Web:   http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/~iraicu
       http://dsl.cs.uchicago.edu/
============================================
============================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/swift-devel/attachments/20070830/ecd0b494/attachment.html>