[petsc-users] Is it possible to keep track of original elements # after a call to DMPlexDistribute ?
Eric Chamberland
Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
Tue Oct 26 12:35:01 CDT 2021
Here is a screenshot of the partition I hard coded (top) and
vertices/element numbers (down):
I have not yet modified the ex44.c example to properly assign the
coordinates...
(but I would not have done it like it is in the last version because the
sCoords array is the global array with global vertices number)
I will have time to do this tomorrow...
Maybe I can first try to reproduce all this with a smaller mesh?
Eric
On 2021-10-26 9:46 a.m., Matthew Knepley wrote:
> Okay, I ran it. Something seems off with the mesh. First, I cannot
> simply explain the partition. The number of shared vertices and edges
> does not seem to come from a straight cut. Second, the mesh look
> scrambled on output.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:49 PM Eric Chamberland
> <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
> <mailto:Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> ok, I started back from your ex44.c example and added the global
> array of coordinates. I just have to code the creation of the
> local coordinates now.
>
> Eric
>
> On 2021-10-20 6:55 p.m., Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Eric Chamberland
>> <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
>> <mailto:Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> we tried to reproduce the error in a simple example.
>>
>> The context is the following: We hard coded the mesh and
>> initial partition into the code (see sConnectivity and
>> sInitialPartition) for 2 ranks and try to create a section in
>> order to use the DMPlexNaturalToGlobalBegin function to
>> retreive our initial element numbers.
>>
>> Now the call to DMPlexDistribute give different errors
>> depending on what type of component we ask the field to be
>> created. For our objective, we would like a global field to
>> be created on elements only (like a P0 interpolation).
>>
>> We now have the following error generated:
>>
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc has generated inconsistent data
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Inconsistency in indices, 18 should be 17
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: See
>> https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html
>> <https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html> for
>> trouble shooting.
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.15.0, Mar 30, 2021
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: ./bug on a named rohan by ericc Wed Oct 20
>> 14:52:36 2021
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options
>> --prefix=/opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7
>> --with-mpi-compilers=1 --with-mpi-dir=/opt/openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7
>> --with-cxx-dialect=C++14 --with-make-np=12
>> --with-shared-libraries=1 --with-debugging=yes
>> --with-memalign=64 --with-visibility=0
>> --with-64-bit-indices=0 --download-ml=yes
>> --download-mumps=yes --download-superlu=yes
>> --download-hpddm=yes --download-slepc=yes
>> --download-superlu_dist=yes --download-parmetis=yes
>> --download-ptscotch=yes --download-metis=yes
>> --download-strumpack=yes --download-suitesparse=yes
>> --download-hypre=yes
>> --with-blaslapack-dir=/opt/intel/oneapi/mkl/2021.1.1/env/../lib/intel64
>> --with-mkl_pardiso-dir=/opt/intel/oneapi/mkl/2021.1.1/env/..
>> --with-mkl_cpardiso-dir=/opt/intel/oneapi/mkl/2021.1.1/env/..
>> --with-scalapack=1
>> --with-scalapack-include=/opt/intel/oneapi/mkl/2021.1.1/env/../include
>> --with-scalapack-lib="-L/opt/intel/oneapi/mkl/2021.1.1/env/../lib/intel64
>> -lmkl_scalapack_lp64 -lmkl_blacs_openmpi_lp64"
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 PetscSFCreateSectionSF() at
>> /tmp/ompi-opt/petsc-3.15.0-debug/src/vec/is/sf/utils/sfutils.c:409
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #2 DMPlexCreateGlobalToNaturalSF() at
>> /tmp/ompi-opt/petsc-3.15.0-debug/src/dm/impls/plex/plexnatural.c:184
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #3 DMPlexDistribute() at
>> /tmp/ompi-opt/petsc-3.15.0-debug/src/dm/impls/plex/plexdistribute.c:1733
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #4 main() at bug_section.cc:159
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: No PETSc Option Table entries
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: ----------------End of Error Message
>> -------send entire error message to petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
>> <mailto:petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov>----------
>>
>> Hope the attached code is self-explaining, note that to make
>> it short, we have not included the final part of it, just the
>> buggy part we are encountering right now...
>>
>> Thanks for your insights,
>>
>> Thanks for making the example. I tweaked it slightly. I put in a
>> test case that just makes a parallel 7 x 10 quad mesh. This works
>> fine. Thus I think it must be something connected with the
>> original mesh. It is hard to get a handle on it without the
>> coordinates.
>> Do you think you could put the coordinate array in? I have added
>> the code to load them (see attached file).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> On 2021-10-06 9:23 p.m., Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:43 PM Eric Chamberland
>>> <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
>>> <mailto:Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>
>>> we tried to use that. Now, we discovered that:
>>>
>>> 1- even if we "ask" for sfNatural creation with
>>> DMSetUseNatural, it is not created because
>>> DMPlexCreateGlobalToNaturalSF looks for a "section":
>>> this is not documented in DMSetUseNaturalso we are
>>> asking ourselfs: "is this a permanent feature or a
>>> temporary situation?"
>>>
>>> I think explaining this will help clear up a lot.
>>>
>>> What the Natural2Global map does is permute a solution
>>> vector into the ordering that it would have had prior to
>>> mesh distribution.
>>> Now, in order to do this permutation, I need to know the
>>> original (global) data layout. If it is not specified
>>> _before_ distribution, we
>>> cannot build the permutation. The section describes the
>>> data layout, so I need it before distribution.
>>>
>>> I cannot think of another way that you would implement this,
>>> but if you want something else, let me know.
>>>
>>> 2- We then tried to create a "section" in different
>>> manners: we took the code into the example
>>> petsc/src/dm/impls/plex/tests/ex15.c. However, we ended
>>> up with a segfault:
>>>
>>> corrupted size vs. prev_size
>>> [rohan:07297] *** Process received signal ***
>>> [rohan:07297] Signal: Aborted (6)
>>> [rohan:07297] Signal code: (-6)
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 0]
>>> /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x13f80)[0x7f6f13be3f80]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 1]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x10b)[0x7f6f109b718b]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 2]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(abort+0x175)[0x7f6f109b8585]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 3]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x7e2f7)[0x7f6f109fb2f7]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 4]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x857ea)[0x7f6f10a027ea]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 5]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x86036)[0x7f6f10a03036]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 6]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x861a3)[0x7f6f10a031a3]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 7]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x88740)[0x7f6f10a05740]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 8]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x1b8)[0x7f6f10a070c8]
>>> [rohan:07297] [ 9]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(__backtrace_symbols+0x134)[0x7f6f10a8b064]
>>> [rohan:07297] [10]
>>> /home/mefpp_ericc/GIREF/bin/MEF++.dev(_Z12reqBacktraceRNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEE+0x4e)[0x4538ce]
>>> [rohan:07297] [11]
>>> /home/mefpp_ericc/GIREF/bin/MEF++.dev(_Z15attacheDebuggerv+0x120)[0x4523c0]
>>> [rohan:07297] [12]
>>> /home/mefpp_ericc/GIREF/lib/libgiref_dev_Util.so(traitementSignal+0x612)[0x7f6f28f503a2]
>>> [rohan:07297] [13]
>>> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3a210)[0x7f6f109b7210]
>>>
>>> [rohan:07297] [14]
>>> /opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7/lib/libpetsc.so.3.15(PetscTrMallocDefault+0x6fd)[0x7f6f22f1b8ed]
>>> [rohan:07297] [15]
>>> /opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7/lib/libpetsc.so.3.15(PetscMallocA+0x5cd)[0x7f6f22f19c2d]
>>> [rohan:07297] [16]
>>> /opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7/lib/libpetsc.so.3.15(PetscSFCreateSectionSF+0xb48)[0x7f6f23268e18]
>>> [rohan:07297] [17]
>>> /opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7/lib/libpetsc.so.3.15(DMPlexCreateGlobalToNaturalSF+0x13b2)[0x7f6f241a5602]
>>> [rohan:07297] [18]
>>> /opt/petsc-3.15.0_debug_openmpi-4.1.0_gcc7/lib/libpetsc.so.3.15(DMPlexDistribute+0x39b1)[0x7f6f23fdca21]
>>>
>>> I am not sure what happened here, but if you could send a
>>> sample code, I will figure it out.
>>>
>>> If we do not create a section, the call to
>>> DMPlexDistribute is successful, but
>>> DMPlexGetGlobalToNaturalSF return a null SF pointer...
>>>
>>> Yes, it just ignores it in this case because it does not
>>> have a global layout.
>>>
>>> Here are the operations we are calling ( this is almost
>>> the code we are using, I just removed verifications and
>>> creation of the connectivity which use our parallel
>>> structure and code):
>>>
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> PetscInt* lCells = 0;
>>> PetscInt lNumCorners = 0;
>>> PetscInt lDimMail = 0;
>>> PetscInt lnumCells = 0;
>>>
>>> //At this point we create the cells for PETSc expected
>>> input for DMPlexBuildFromCellListParallel and set
>>> lNumCorners, lDimMail and lnumCells to correct values.
>>> ...
>>>
>>> DM lDMBete = 0
>>> DMPlexCreate(lMPIComm,&lDMBete);
>>>
>>> DMSetDimension(lDMBete, lDimMail);
>>>
>>> DMPlexBuildFromCellListParallel(lDMBete,
>>> lnumCells,
>>> PETSC_DECIDE,
>>> pLectureElementsLocaux.reqNbTotalSommets(),
>>> lNumCorners,
>>> lCells,
>>> PETSC_NULL);
>>>
>>> DM lDMBeteInterp = 0;
>>> DMPlexInterpolate(lDMBete, &lDMBeteInterp);
>>> DMDestroy(&lDMBete);
>>> lDMBete = lDMBeteInterp;
>>>
>>> DMSetUseNatural(lDMBete,PETSC_TRUE);
>>>
>>> PetscSF lSFMigrationSansOvl = 0;
>>> PetscSF lSFMigrationOvl = 0;
>>> DM lDMDistribueSansOvl = 0;
>>> DM lDMAvecOverlap = 0;
>>>
>>> PetscPartitioner lPart;
>>> DMPlexGetPartitioner(lDMBete, &lPart);
>>> PetscPartitionerSetFromOptions(lPart);
>>>
>>> PetscSection section;
>>> PetscInt numFields = 1;
>>> PetscInt numBC = 0;
>>> PetscInt numComp[1] = {1};
>>> PetscInt numDof[4] = {1, 0, 0, 0};
>>> PetscInt bcFields[1] = {0};
>>> IS bcPoints[1] = {NULL};
>>>
>>> DMSetNumFields(lDMBete, numFields);
>>>
>>> DMPlexCreateSection(lDMBete, NULL, numComp, numDof,
>>> numBC, bcFields, bcPoints, NULL, NULL, §ion);
>>> DMSetLocalSection(lDMBete, section);
>>>
>>> DMPlexDistribute(lDMBete, 0, &lSFMigrationSansOvl,
>>> &lDMDistribueSansOvl); // segfault!
>>>
>>> ===========
>>>
>>> So we have other question/remarks:
>>>
>>> 3- Maybe PETSc expect something specific that is
>>> missing/not verified: for example, we didn't gave any
>>> coordinates since we just want to partition and compute
>>> overlap for the mesh... and then recover our element
>>> numbers in a "simple way"
>>>
>>> 4- We are telling ourselves it is somewhat a "big price
>>> to pay" to have to build an unused section to have the
>>> global to natural ordering set ? Could this requirement
>>> be avoided?
>>>
>>> I don't think so. There would have to be _some_ way of
>>> describing your data layout in terms of mesh points, and I
>>> do not see how you could use less memory doing that.
>>>
>>> 5- Are there any improvement towards our usages in 3.16
>>> release?
>>>
>>> Let me try and run the code above.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2021-09-29 7:39 p.m., Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:18 PM Eric Chamberland
>>>> <Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca
>>>> <mailto:Eric.Chamberland at giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I come back with _almost_ the original question:
>>>>
>>>> I would like to add an integer information (*our*
>>>> original element
>>>> number, not petsc one) on each element of the
>>>> DMPlex I create with
>>>> DMPlexBuildFromCellListParallel.
>>>>
>>>> I would like this interger to be distribruted by or
>>>> the same way
>>>> DMPlexDistribute distribute the mesh.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to do this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we already have support for what you want. If
>>>> you call
>>>>
>>>> https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DM/DMSetUseNatural.html
>>>> <https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DM/DMSetUseNatural.html>
>>>>
>>>> before DMPlexDistribute(), it will compute a PetscSF
>>>> encoding the global to natural map. You
>>>> can get it with
>>>>
>>>> https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DMPLEX/DMPlexGetGlobalToNaturalSF.html
>>>> <https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DMPLEX/DMPlexGetGlobalToNaturalSF.html>
>>>>
>>>> and use it with
>>>>
>>>> https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DMPLEX/DMPlexGlobalToNaturalBegin.html
>>>> <https://petsc.org/main/docs/manualpages/DMPLEX/DMPlexGlobalToNaturalBegin.html>
>>>>
>>>> Is this sufficient?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>> On 2021-07-14 1:18 p.m., Eric Chamberland wrote:
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > I want to use DMPlexDistribute from PETSc for
>>>> computing overlapping
>>>> > and play with the different partitioners supported.
>>>> >
>>>> > However, after calling DMPlexDistribute, I
>>>> noticed the elements are
>>>> > renumbered and then the original number is lost.
>>>> >
>>>> > What would be the best way to keep track of the
>>>> element renumbering?
>>>> >
>>>> > a) Adding an optional parameter to let the user
>>>> retrieve a vector or
>>>> > "IS" giving the old number?
>>>> >
>>>> > b) Adding a DMLabel (seems a wrong good solution)
>>>> >
>>>> > c) Other idea?
>>>> >
>>>> > Of course, I don't want to loose performances
>>>> with the need of this
>>>> > "mapping"...
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> >
>>>> > Eric
>>>> >
>>>> --
>>>> Eric Chamberland, ing., M. Ing
>>>> Professionnel de recherche
>>>> GIREF/Université Laval
>>>> (418) 656-2131 poste 41 22 42
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they
>>>> begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting
>>>> than any results to which their experiments lead.
>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>
>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eric Chamberland, ing., M. Ing
>>> Professionnel de recherche
>>> GIREF/Université Laval
>>> (418) 656-2131 poste 41 22 42
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin
>>> their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
>>> results to which their experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Chamberland, ing., M. Ing
>> Professionnel de recherche
>> GIREF/Université Laval
>> (418) 656-2131 poste 41 22 42
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>> which their experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
> --
> Eric Chamberland, ing., M. Ing
> Professionnel de recherche
> GIREF/Université Laval
> (418) 656-2131 poste 41 22 42
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
> their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
--
Eric Chamberland, ing., M. Ing
Professionnel de recherche
GIREF/Université Laval
(418) 656-2131 poste 41 22 42
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20211026/cfb4bccf/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: eejjfmbjimlkboec.png
Type: image/png
Size: 87901 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20211026/cfb4bccf/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list