[petsc-users] [External] Re: request to add an option similar to use_omp_threads for mumps to cusparse solver
Chang Liu
cliu at pppl.gov
Wed Oct 13 10:10:21 CDT 2021
Thank you Junchao for explaining this. I guess in my case the code is
just calling a seq solver like superlu to do factorization on GPUs.
My idea is that I want to have a traditional MPI code to utilize GPUs
with cusparse. Right now cusparse does not support mpiaij matrix, so I
want the code to have a mpiaij matrix when adding all the matrix terms,
and then transform the matrix to seqaij when doing the factorization and
solve. This involves sending the data to the master process, and I think
the petsc mumps solver have something similar already.
Chang
On 10/13/21 10:18 AM, Junchao Zhang wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:07 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov
> <mailto:mfadams at lbl.gov>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:45 PM Chang Liu <cliu at pppl.gov
> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> The option I use is like
>
> -pc_type bjacobi -pc_bjacobi_blocks 16 -ksp_type fgmres -mat_type
> aijcusparse *-sub_pc_factor_mat_solver_type cusparse *-sub_ksp_type
> preonly *-sub_pc_type lu* -ksp_max_it 2000 -ksp_rtol 1.e-300
> -ksp_atol 1.e-300
>
>
> Note, If you use -log_view the last column (rows are the method like
> MatFactorNumeric) has the percent of work in the GPU.
>
> Junchao: *This* implies that we have a cuSparse LU factorization. Is
> that correct? (I don't think we do)
>
> No, we don't have cuSparse LU factorization. If you check
> MatLUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJCUSPARSE(),you will find it calls
> MatLUFactorSymbolic_SeqAIJ() instead.
> So I don't understand Chang's idea. Do you want to make bigger blocks?
>
>
> I think this one do both factorization and solve on gpu.
>
> You can check the runex72_aijcusparse.sh file in petsc install
> directory, and try it your self (this is only lu factorization
> without
> iterative solve).
>
> Chang
>
> On 10/12/21 1:17 PM, Mark Adams wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:19 AM Chang Liu <cliu at pppl.gov
> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>
> > <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Junchao,
> >
> > No I only needs it to be transferred within a node. I use
> block-Jacobi
> > method and GMRES to solve the sparse matrix, so each
> direct solver will
> > take care of a sub-block of the whole matrix. In this
> way, I can use
> > one
> > GPU to solve one sub-block, which is stored within one node.
> >
> > It was stated in the documentation that cusparse solver
> is slow.
> > However, in my test using ex72.c, the cusparse solver is
> faster than
> > mumps or superlu_dist on CPUs.
> >
> >
> > Are we talking about the factorization, the solve, or both?
> >
> > We do not have an interface to cuSparse's LU factorization (I
> just
> > learned that it exists a few weeks ago).
> > Perhaps your fast "cusparse solver" is '-pc_type lu -mat_type
> > aijcusparse' ? This would be the CPU factorization, which is the
> > dominant cost.
> >
> >
> > Chang
> >
> > On 10/12/21 10:24 AM, Junchao Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi, Chang,
> > > For the mumps solver, we usually transfers matrix
> and vector
> > data
> > > within a compute node. For the idea you propose, it
> looks like
> > we need
> > > to gather data within MPI_COMM_WORLD, right?
> > >
> > > Mark, I remember you said cusparse solve is slow
> and you would
> > > rather do it on CPU. Is it right?
> > >
> > > --Junchao Zhang
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:25 PM Chang Liu via petsc-users
> > > <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>>
> > <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov
> <mailto:petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>>>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently, it is possible to use mumps solver in
> PETSC with
> > > -mat_mumps_use_omp_threads option, so that
> multiple MPI
> > processes will
> > > transfer the matrix and rhs data to the master
> rank, and then
> > master
> > > rank will call mumps with OpenMP to solve the matrix.
> > >
> > > I wonder if someone can develop similar option for
> cusparse
> > solver.
> > > Right now, this solver does not work with
> mpiaijcusparse. I
> > think a
> > > possible workaround is to transfer all the matrix
> data to one MPI
> > > process, and then upload the data to GPU to solve.
> In this
> > way, one can
> > > use cusparse solver for a MPI program.
> > >
> > > Chang
> > > --
> > > Chang Liu
> > > Staff Research Physicist
> > > +1 609 243 3438
> > > cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>
> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>>
> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>
> > <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>>>
> > > Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
> > > 100 Stellarator Rd, Princeton NJ 08540, USA
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Chang Liu
> > Staff Research Physicist
> > +1 609 243 3438
> > cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov
> <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>>
> > Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
> > 100 Stellarator Rd, Princeton NJ 08540, USA
> >
>
> --
> Chang Liu
> Staff Research Physicist
> +1 609 243 3438
> cliu at pppl.gov <mailto:cliu at pppl.gov>
> Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
> 100 Stellarator Rd, Princeton NJ 08540, USA
>
--
Chang Liu
Staff Research Physicist
+1 609 243 3438
cliu at pppl.gov
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
100 Stellarator Rd, Princeton NJ 08540, USA
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list