[petsc-users] Binary format in real vs. complex scalar type configurations

Barry Smith bsmith at petsc.dev
Tue May 11 15:59:15 CDT 2021



> On May 11, 2021, at 3:08 PM, Frederico Teixeira <teixeira at zmt.swiss> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pierre,
> 
> Thanks for your tip. 
> I don't have access to MATLAB. Would Octave also work? Or Python?

   Yes, they should both be fine. All you need to is split the matrix into the 2 matrices in Octave or Python and then save both of them with the PETSc real format configure.

  Barry

> 
> Regards,
>  Frederico.
> 
> Dr. Frederico Teixeira
> Computational Modeler and Software Developer, ZMT <http://www.itis.swiss/> (member of Zurich43 <https://www.z43.swiss/>)
> 
> P +41 44 245 9698
> Zeughausstrasse 43, 8004 Zurich, Switzerland
> 
> 
> From: "Pierre Jolivet" <pierre at joliv.et>
> To: "Frederico Teixeira" <teixeira at zmt.swiss>
> Cc: "petsc-users" <petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 6:03:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Binary format in real vs. complex scalar type configurations
> 
> Hello Frederico,
> I’m not sure that’s possible.
> Here is what I do, it makes me sick, but mixing precisions/scalar types with PETSc is difficult (crossing my fingers this will be better with future).
> In MATLAB (after putting petsc/share/petsc/matlab in the path):
> A = PetscBinaryRead('your_binary_mat_with_re+im.dat','complex',true); % scalar-type=complex
> PetscBinaryWrite('re.dat',real(A)); % scalar-type=real
> PetscBinaryWrite('im.dat',imag(A)); % scalar-type=real
> 
> Thanks,
> Pierre
> 
> On 11 May 2021, at 3:30 PM, Frederico Teixeira <teixeira at zmt.swiss <mailto:teixeira at zmt.swiss>> wrote:
> 
> Dear fellows,
> 
> I hope this message finds you safe and well.
> 
> I have a complex-valued matrix and its real/imaginary components in binary format. They were extracted from a solver that only works with "scalar-type=complex" configuration.
> I am getting weird results when I load them into a small test program that's configured with "scalar-type=real", but I believe this is expected.
> At the end of the day, I would like to have both real and imaginary components as real-valued matrices.
> Is it possible to do it? I want to test preconditioners that are tailored for this sort of problem.
> 
> Regards,
>  Frederico.
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20210511/ea2863bb/attachment.html>


More information about the petsc-users mailing list